Advertisement

Pollard questions Hardik's decision after Shardul not used despite Impact Sub call: 'I will go back and ask'

Mumbai Indians' heavy defeat against Sunrisers Hyderabad has sparked a debate after Shardul Thakur, brought in as an Impact Player, was not used to bowl by captain Hardik Pandya. Kieron Pollard also admitted confusion over the decision.

Advertisement
Shardul Thakur came i9n as an Impact Sub in the second innings but did not bowl a single delivery. Image: Reuters
Shardul Thakur came i9n as an Impact Sub in the second innings but did not bowl a single delivery. Image: Reuters
FirstCricket Staff|Apr 30, 2026, 18:52:13 IST

Mumbai Indians’ heavy defeat against Sunrisers Hyderabad at the Wankhede Stadium on Wednesday night raised several questions, but one decision stood out the most. Why did Shardul Thakur not bowl a single over despite being brought in as an Impact Player?

MI were already under pressure after SRH openers Travis Head and Abhishek Sharma went on a rampage in the powerplay, smashing 92 runs in just six overs while chasing a massive target of 244. In response, Mumbai brought in Shardul Thakur as an Impact Sub after the powerplay.

Advertisement

However, what followed left many surprised. Shardul was not used at all with the ball despite MI bowlers getting thashed all around the park. Mumbai Indians eventually suffered their sixth defeat of the season and slipped further down the points table, sitting at ninth position.

Polland has no idea why Shardul was not used

The decision quickly became a talking point, with fans and experts questioning the strategy. The confusion was even reflected in the MI camp itself. During the post-match press conference in Mumbai, batting coach Kieron Pollard admitted that he did not have clarity on why Shardul was not used.

firstcricketMore from Firstcricket

“About why we didn’t have Shardul bowl a single over... I will go back and ask. Then again, if he had given away 20 runs in an over, it would have been a totally different conversation,” Pollard said.

It is unlikely that captain Hardik Pandya simply forgot about the additional bowling option, particularly in a match where MI’s bowling attack was heavily dominated. This has also raised questions around MI's decision-making, especially in pressure moments.

Advertisement

As far as the match is concerned, MI won the toss and elected to bat first. Ryan Rickelton scored a 44-ball century to help his team post a massive total. In reply, Sunrisers Hyderabad chased down the target with ease, registering the four-highest chase in IPL history. Travis Head and Abhishek Sharma provided an explosive start before Heinrich Klaasen took over and finished the game.

Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.
First Published:Apr 30, 2026, 18:52:13 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending Stories

Rohit shines with historic Lord's ton, but England seal series 2-1

With his back against the wall and an illustrious career on the line, Rohit Sharma silenced his critics the only way he can, smashing one of his most celebrated centuries in recent memory, though it wasn't enough to prevent a 27run defeat in the third ODI against England, as India surrendered the series 12 here Sunday
4 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next