Advertisement
Sections
Vantage | Why members of US-led coalition in Red Sea are hesitating in their participation
All of America's partners — France, Australia, Spain, Canada, and Norway — have called for a ceasefire in Gaza. If the war ends, so do these Red Sea attacks

The game of Houthi rebels versus the West is being played out in the Red Sea, with the Houthis making the first move. They picked off commercial ships one by one. So the West responded.The West has announced a 10-nation maritime coalition, sort of like the Red Sea Avengers. Just one problem: These avengers are barely interested. Of course, the US doesn't admit this. According to Washington, the coalition is adding new members, which had increased to 20 by Friday.But who are these members? We know 12 of them. The initial 10 plus Greece and Australia. That leaves eight unknown countries. Apparently, they don't want to be publicly named. Masked superheroes are all the rage, but this is the real world.Countries love adding their names to groups and coalitions, so if they are not, it means one thing. They're not fully invested, and we don't blame them. Even the known members are not keen.For example, Australia has just sent 11 soldiers. And don't laugh at that, because the Netherlands is sending two soldiers. Norway is sending 10. So the question is: Where is the new hardware that was promised?Well, France and Britain have sent warships, again with a rider. The French ships will remain under French command. They won't take orders from the US. As for new deployments, there is no word. Same with Italy, which is sending a warship to the Red Sea. But it's not part of the US mission. It is part of existing operations.This reminds us of a bad party thrown by a good friend. One cannot skip it, nor can one stay for long. So what does one do? Token participation. It may save one's friendship, but it won't save the Red Sea.More ships are being re-routed. Hong Kong's OOCL is the latest to make the announcement. Their ships will avoid the Red Sea. Instead, they will sail around Africa. And these route changes have consequences.Oil markets are spooked. Shipping rates are up. And exporters are worried. If one looks at the Chinese market. Shipping rates from China to the Mediterranean are up 44 percent!Even Indian exporters are reporting similar numbers, 30 to 40 percent. So I guess the obvious question is this: Has the Red Sea force failed? ‘Fail’ may be a strong word. But the start is not impressive.We have told you why Arab countries haven't joined, especially Saudi Arabia. They fear reprisals from the Houthis. But now let's look at Western nations. Among them, only one seems interested — The United Kingdom — it has put a warship under US Command. Its foreign minister is also lobbying in the Arab World. He was in Cairo on Thursday. He tried hard to get Egypt onboard.“It would be damaging to Egypt, it would be damaging to Britain, it would be damaging to the whole world, if there are these repeated attacks on shipping. That is what Operation Prosperity Guardian is all about and Britain is proud to take part in that with British ships trying to help keep those sea lanes open,” said British Foreign Secretary, David Cameron.Did it work? Honestly we don't know. Maybe Egypt is one of those eight anonymous members, Or maybe it's not. There's no way to know. Which brings us to why Western states are reluctant? First, there is a lack of trust in the US. The US has not hit back at the Houthis. It is almost like Joe Biden is holding back.And second, this coalition isn't the only solution to this problem. There's a much easier one — end this war.Just look at all of America's partners — France, Australia, Spain, Canada, and Norway — these are all countries that called for a ceasefire in Gaza. If the war ends, so do these Red Sea attacks.That's what the Houthis have said. It's only the US that doesn't want a ceasefire. So can you really blame Paris, Canberra or Madrid? They want a ceasefire. They know it will end the Red Sea problem.They also know the US can do it. Yet, they're being asked to send warships and soldiers. So the hesitation is not a surprise, and we're not saying the coalition won't work. It's too early for such an assessment, but it does reveal the problem with America's approach. A military solution to a political problem — when was the last time that it worked?Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
First Published:Dec 23, 2023, 12:58:56 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement

When Manila and Tokyo draw a line, Beijing draws a red line
What should have been a routine maritime-boundary negotiation between Japan and the Philippines has become a contest over China’s power to veto its neighbours’ strategic choices
6 min read
Bangladesh gets a new envoy to reset its India ties
The selection of a serving foreign secretary underscores the seriousness with which Dhaka now views its relationship with New Delhi
3 min read
Escalation trap to an exit strategy: How can the Iran war end?
This war is no longer about outright victory; it is about finding an exit without appearing to lose
7 min read
India must seize its demographic dividend before it fades
Adequate funding for universal education, leak-proof exams and job creation are vital to leverage India's demographic dividend before it’s too late
4 min read
Bangladesh’s instability has sharpened India’s ‘Chicken Neck’ challenge
India could consider notifying a union territory around the Siliguri Corridor consisting of parts of all bordering districts
8 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
