India’s ten-minute mirage: The human cost of quick commerce growth

As the ongoing monsoon fury ravages India's metropolitan landscapes — turning arterial roads into raging rivers and residential colonies into isolated islands — a chilling contrast emerges in our urban consciousness. Safe and dry within the confines of our homes, we seamlessly navigate our smartphones to order groceries, expecting them to arrive in a mere ten minutes. Minutes later, a rain-drenched youngster, clad in a thin neon raincoat, navigates treacherous, waterlogged streets on a precarious two-wheeler to deliver a packet of chips and a carton of milk. This stark imagery bares the scary underbelly of India’s celebrated quick commerce boom: the compromised safety and fragile livelihoods of the unorganised riders driving this 10-minute phenomenon.

A decade ago, Arun Sundararajan’s seminal book The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism reframed the global political economy discourse. A decade down the line, the shared economy idea might be seen as illusory, but the core of crowd-based capitalism and the end of employment hold ground firmly. The "digitisation of trust" Sundararajan outlined as a phenomenon rings true, enabling strangers to safely transact across brands and categories at the press of a button given the highly affordable data availability (Jio phenomenon).

More from Opinion

10-Minute Fix: Decoding the Political Economy

What explains this 10-minute fix? At its core, the q-commerce revolution is propelled by the hyper-consumerism and instant gratification demanded by an affluent, time-starved urban middle class. However, the true fuel for this engine is deeply rooted in the political economy of India and its structurally distressed job market. We are witnessing an era where a massive demographic dividend is confronted with a severe deficit of formal employment. Millions of young, semi-skilled or unskilled workers find themselves pushed to the margins of the economy, leaving them with no choice but to plug into digital labour platforms.

The Paradox of Growth and Worker Precarity

What is profoundly worrying is that this sad state of affairs persists even as global and domestic majors ride an unprecedented business boom. The Indian quick commerce market is projected to surge to an astonishing about $7 billion by 2025-26, clocking a record growth in the services sector. The irony here is that wealth creation is unequal and asymmetrical. The quick commerce platforms attract big investments in pursuit of greater market share, while the delivery boys and girls are labelled as "independent contractors" or "partners". This title is by design to circumvent the obligations of an established employer-employee relationship. The truth is that these workers bear the brunt of operational risks – physical and economic.

Fuel costs, vehicular wear and tear, and medical bills arising from road accidents drive the 10-minute industry without the cushion of formal job security, paid leave, or fixed working hours. So, an informal phenomenon is driving a strikingly growing formal business. While Indian platforms maintain a "rights lottery" where workers navigate varying state-level rules, advanced economies are establishing firm national and supranational baselines. Labour is a quasi-state subject, and some states have moved independently to drive policy change, but a national charter is yet in the works.

The Centre's Push for Social Safety

It isn’t that the government isn’t seized of the challenge. At last year's end the centre announced a bold reform to operationalise the Code on Social Security. Taking note of industry estimates that the gig worker size could balloon to 2.5 crore by the end of the decade, the Union government mandated vital welfare measures. Broadly, the policy stipulates health insurance, accident cover, and maternity benefits, a slow but definite pivot formalising the informal economy. The key to the success of the initiative is the enhancement of the e-Shram portal, aiming to capture real-time data and ensure the portability of social security benefits across different platforms and geographic borders.

The yawning gap today is the funding mechanism, which envisages that platforms contribute 1 to 2 per cent of their turnover to a social security fund. This singular model runs the risk of not being able to fully account for the complex, multi-vertical nature of digital platforms, ultimately undermining the long-term sustainability of the safety net. Yes, the portal is a big breakthrough, but mere registration doesn’t guarantee enforcement. The global learning is crystal clear: the technological efficiency of an app does not exempt the company operating it from foundational labour standards. India cannot duck the socio-economic responsibility while global behemoths driving the QC model continue to see a fattening topline, if not bottom line, as yet.

Global Best Practices and Algorithmic Accountability

Global best practices offer compelling case studies in algorithmic accountability and worker rights. The European Union has taken a pioneering stance with its Platform Work Directive. Instead of workers fighting protracted, expensive legal battles to prove they are employees, the burden of proof now rests entirely on the digital platforms to prove they are not. If platforms control the workers’ pay, dictate their appearance, and use algorithms to govern their tasks, the EU dictates they must bear the responsibilities of an employer.

Spain is another case study. "Rider's Law" there serves as a benchmark governance tool. It mandates there is an employee nomenclature for the rider. The other safety being transparency in data and algorithms. Workers can evaluate their performance, allocate tasks, and determine their varying earnings. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is exploring a Convention on Decent Work in the Platform Economy.

Navigating the Global Q-Commerce Vertical

Globally, India is at the vanguard of the q-commerce vertical. While Western markets are still debating the unit economics of 15-minute deliveries, Indian platforms have perfected the hyper-local dark store model and are now aggressively expanding into Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. As this economic expansion occurs, India has a unique opportunity to export better labour practices rather than simply pushing urban exploitation into the hinterland. India can lead the global narrative not just in logistical efficiency but also in demonstrating how to build a humane, equitable gig economy.

Enhancing the Value Chain Contribution

How do we enhance the contribution of the delivery worker in the broader value chain? First, riders are not mere logistical props. They are drivers of a new-age economy. At the conceptual level, diverse stakeholders need to invest in a cogent upskilling programme that enables growth, plugging them into key roles in the value chain post a handsome run as a rider. From the technology perspective, algorithmic management must represent trust and transparency. And a robust human-led grievance redressal mechanism. Most importantly, a guaranteed minimum wage floor, dynamically adjusted for fuel inflation and platform wait times, is a requirement of the day.

Conclusion: A Humane Viksit Bharat

The political economy of India cannot afford to build a thriving digital business model without paying for the key component of the chain — labour. The distress in our job market makes millions available for gig work, but demographic desperation should never be an invitation for exploitation. The 10-minute delivery phenomenon is a testament to India's entrepreneurial spirit and immense technological prowess. Let us celebrate this phenomenon, absolutely. But remember the young riders braving the monsoon rains to deliver are afforded the dignity, social safety, and quality of life they deserve.

(Rakesh Khar is a seasoned editor. He writes at the intersection of politics, business, technology and society. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.)