Advertisement

Common Civil Code respects constitutional ethos, protects women and children

Instead of resorting to the age-old tactic of postponement or delay, marked by disputes and strife, it is imperative for the diverse and community-minded populace to unite and actively implement this legislation

Advertisement
Rasal Singh|Feb 11, 2024, 14:03:49 IST

In India's multifaceted legal landscape, a singular, all-encompassing family law that resonates across diverse socio-religious groups remains absent. The proposition of a Common Civil Code (CCC) seeks to bridge this gap, envisioning a unified legal framework that melds the myriad strands of family laws into a coherent whole.The CCC is envisaged as a codified set of common laws aiming to supersede diverse personal legislation, especially regarding women and children in India, thereby governing social domains such as matrimony, succession, and guardianship uniformly across all citizenries. This initiative is pivotal in fostering engendered-legal egalitarianism, fortifying the constitutional fabric of the Indian polity, and advancing the ethos of gender equality, woman empowerment, child security, and social equity, thereby knitting a more cohesive and inclusive societal tapestry.As we stride into the 21st century, the clarion call for a CCC resonates louder than ever, particularly as Uttarakhand has approved the CCC. Uttarakhand has become the first state in the country after Independence to adopt the CCC, though similar legislation has been operational in Goa since the days of Portuguese rule.Key proposalsThe Uttarakhand CCC bill marks a significant stride towards reforming personal laws in India; it proposes the abolition of practices like polygamy and child marriage, advocating for a uniform marriageable age to ensure that girls have the opportunity to complete their education. The bill envisions equal inheritance rights for both sons and daughters and uniform divorce procedures, emphasising the necessity of marriage registration for accessing state services. This initiative extends adoption rights across the board, including for Muslim women, and calls for the elimination of controversial practices such as halala and iddat, while also making provisions for legal recognition of live-in relationships. This will not only empower the women of Uttarakhand and protect its children, but it will also act as a precedent for the whole of the country.Furthermore, the bill carefully navigates the socio-cultural landscape of Uttarakhand by exempting Scheduled Tribes, acknowledging the need to preserve the unique heritage of the state's indigenous communities. It proposes a harmonised approach to divorce, mandating court oversight and introducing a 'cooling-off' period to foster reconciliation. Innovative measures for child custody in cases of parental disputes suggest grandparents as potential guardians, simplifying the guardianship process for orphaned children, and outlining provisions for the welfare of a deceased spouse's parents. These comprehensive proposals reflect a thoughtful attempt to balance the preservation of cultural diversity with the pursuit of legal uniformity, aiming to weave a stronger fabric of national integration and social justice.Time and again, PM Modi has emphasised that the country cannot function with multiple laws and underscored that the Common Civil Code aligns with the founding principles and ideals of the Constitution. The move by the Uttarakhand government to approve the CCC signals a step closer to the realisation of a uniform legal framework in the state, addressing issues of personal law that have long been a point of contention. Further, the Indian government is expected to utilise Uttarakhand's bill as a foundational blueprint for crafting a national CCC bill, with plans to introduce it in Parliament's winter session. However, the political arena shows a divide on the CCC, with parties like Congress, CPI, and Trinamool among those opposing it, while AAP, Shiv Sena, and others support the initiative.Historical journeyThe discourse surrounding the CCC in India has long been a focal point of intense debate and contention, challenging the fabric of Indian political and social spheres for many years. Its first mention can be traced back to the 1833 Charter Act, which granted the British government the authority to codify Hindu and Muslim laws. The laws were mainly around banning grotesque practices like Sati and legalising widow remarriage in the Hindu community. In the lead-up to India's independence, the Lex Loci report of 1840 underscored the imperative for a unified legal framework, particularly concerning criminal, contractual, and civil law, leading to their significant development and acknowledgment. Despite this progress, the Queen's Proclamation in 1859, which vowed non-intervention in religious matters, ensured that personal laws remained untouched, preserving traditional religious legal practices. However, it was only in the early 20th century that the idea of a CCC began to gain significant momentum.The CCC's journey, deeply rooted in the constitutional directive enshrined in Article 44, embodies the aspiration for universal legal equality, yet its realization remains elusive, shadowed by ongoing religious and cultural debates. The concept was significantly deliberated upon during the formation of the Indian Constitution, aiming to bring disparate personal laws under a unified legal canopy, thereby promoting commonality and fairness in social matters for all citizens.The genesis of the CCC discourse can be traced back to the pivotal discussions within the Constituent Assembly, where luminaries such as Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, Sardar Patel, Hansa Mehta, and Meenu Masani, among others, laid the foundational arguments for a modernized legal system that upholds gender equality and individual rights, championing the cause of national unity and secularism. Despite the efforts of the notable leaders and later the inclusion of the CCC in the Directive Principles of State Policy, the proposal was met with resistance, particularly from sections of the Muslim community, highlighting the intricate challenge of reconciling a unified legal framework with India's pluralistic identity.After the Constitution came into effect, the Indian government undertook several reforms in Hindu personal laws. In the 1950s, a series of laws known as the Hindu Code Bills were passed, which reformed Hindu law and made it more progressive, especially concerning women's rights. These included the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Succession Act, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, and the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act.However, similar reforms were not carried out for other religious communities, particularly Muslims, due to political sensitivities and resistance from these religious groups.The imperative for a CCC has also been underscored by various rulings from India's apex court, advocating for a harmonized legal framework that transcends the segmented laws currently governing familial and personal matters. These legal pronouncements not only interpret the constitutional mandate but also highlight the pressing need for a CCC to align with evolving societal norms and principles of justice. Below are five Supreme Court judgements that have significantly contributed to the discourse on the CCC:Shah Bano Case (1985): A watershed moment, this case emphasised the need for a common civil code for women's economic empowerment. The court underscored the disparities in maintenance granted to Muslim women under personal laws compared to women from other communities.Sarla Mudgal Case (1995): Focusing on the constitutional ethos of the nation, this case stressed the importance of a CCC in preventing discrimination against women based on religious lines. The court reiterated that a CCC would contribute to the larger goal of gender justice and equality.John Vallamattom Case (2003): Highlighting the urgency of a CCC to avoid discrimination against vulnerable sections, particularly women, this judgement emphasised the need for a uniform legal framework to ensure justice and equal rights.Danial Latifi Case (2001): While addressing the issue of maintenance, the court stressed the necessity of a CCC to ensure gender justice and protect the rights of women.Joseph Shine Case (2018): A landmark judgement on adultery, this case underscored the need for gender-neutral and common laws. It contributed to the ongoing discourse on a CCC by emphasising the importance of eliminating discriminatory practices in the name of personal laws.All the above judgements and SC observations time and again emphasised the need for the CCC to safeguard the rights of vulnerable and weaker sections of society—women and children—who are often dependent on the male members of the family across diverse socio-religious groups.The need for CCCIndia currently operates under a system of separate personal laws. Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains are governed by the Hindu Code Bill (which includes laws like the Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, etc.), while Muslims are governed by their personal law (Shariat), which includes laws like the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act. Christians and Parsis have their own separate personal laws. Additionally, the Indian Divorce Act and the Special Marriage Act are laws that anyone can opt into, regardless of their religion. All communities are structured in a manner where male supremacy dominates within the family and outside. There can be variations in degrees of patriarchy or gender discrimination, but there is little doubt that in the overall context, women’s relegation reinforces itself, generally leaving little space for egalitarianism. Currently, personal laws are discriminatory towards women, especially in the areas of marriage, divorce, and inheritance. For instance, Muslim women do not have the right to maintenance after divorce, similar to a Hindu woman. This created ambiguity and discrimination among them.The discussion around polygamy within Islamic jurisprudence underscores its constrained intent, primarily safeguarding orphans and promoting equity among spouses, as delineated in the Quran. This viewpoint spurred legal reforms in nations like Turkey and Tunisia, outlawing polygamy on secular and theological bases, respectively. Such legislative changes are part of a wider movement towards modernising laws to better align with contemporary socio-economic and moral frameworks, as seen in Algeria and Morocco. Examples from other countries validate the significance of the CCC. Even countries like Saudi Arabia are taking steps to reconstruct their laws to enhance gender equality and social welfare. Russia, the USA, Switzerland, Brazil, and Germany are among the few countries that have their own CCC.However, in India, despite increasing calls for reform, especially from Muslim women, the laws governing polygamy remain entrenched in tradition and lack formal codification, presenting a key opportunity for legal reform. As Babasaheb Ambedkar and other learned members of the Constituent Assembly had proposed, uniformity in personal laws is essential for empowering women and ensuring gender equality in matters of marriage, divorce, and inheritance. A CCC would eliminate discriminatory practices that deprive women of their rights and provide them with equal opportunities and protections.Numerous social and political organisations have actively championed the cause of a Common Civil Code (CCC) in India. This advocacy can be traced back to 1967, when the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, in its manifesto, pledged to enact a CCC if it assumed power, with a specific focus on issues like marriage, adoption, and succession. In 1972, the Maharashtra Muslim Women's Conference, presided over by Sharifa Tyabji, voiced support for the CCC and fundamental rights for women. Subsequently, in 1974, a delegation of six Muslim individuals met with President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, urging the adoption of a common code to safeguard women's rights. Prominent figures like Maharashtra Chief Minister Sharad Pawar, Harkishan Singh Surjit of the Communist Party of India (M), and the Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) expressed their endorsement of the CCC, emphasising its alignment with Article 44 of the Constitution. This advocacy continued through various party manifestos, culminating in a call for the CCC's implementation.The Common Civil Code will thus ensure that all women and children, regardless of their religion, are treated equally and fairly in all matters of personal law. Besides, having a single set of laws would address the problems of multiple laws in different regions within the same legal framework. It would be more convenient for judicial procedures, and freedom of choice would be given to individuals. The implementation of a CCC would also strengthen the true character of the Indian Constitution.Unaffected stanceUnlike the apprehensions surrounding it, this law will not influence the marital customs of different religions or tribes. It is important to emphasise that the Common Civil Code will not interfere with the customs and traditions of any religion or tribe in India. Marital customs, such as 'Nikah' among Muslims, 'Anand Karaj' among Sikhs, 'Phera in front of fire' among Hindus, and 'Holy Matrimony' among Christians, will continue to be practiced according to the respective beliefs of each religion.Furthermore, the Common Civil Code will not impact the customs and traditions of tribal communities in the country. The Indian Constitution contains provisions to protect the social and traditional practices of tribes, such as Article 371(A) for Nagas and Article 371(G) for Mizos.Additionally, the establishment of the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes and the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006 further safeguard their rights and customs. Tribal areas are designated under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Constitution, and various councils and autonomous bodies ensure the protection of tribal customs and traditions. Therefore, the Common Civil Code will not affect the constitutional safeguards in place for tribal communities.Way forwardThe current government's commitment to the welfare of women and children goes beyond mere words, evident in its tangible actions at the grassroots level. The recent passage of the Nari Shakti Vandan Bill in Parliament marks a substantial milestone in the pursuit of gender equality.Furthermore, a series of impactful initiatives, including the PM Ujjwala scheme, support for Anganwadi workers, a dedicated focus on maternal health, and programmes such as the Lakhpati Didi scheme, Mission Shakti, Mahila Samman Savings Certificate scheme, and PM Matru Vandana Yojna, all underscore its unwavering dedication.Concurrently, resources from PM CARES have been channeled to provide aid to children orphaned during the COVID-19 pandemic, while initiatives like Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, skill development programs, and AI-integrated learning platforms are strategically positioned to secure a prosperous future for the nation.The forthcoming adoption of the Common Civil Code (CCC) serves as another significant step in the government's mission to empower women and children, reaffirming its steadfast commitment to their well-being and progress.“There is no chance of the welfare of the world unless the condition of women is improved. It is not possible for a bird to fly on one wing.” -Swami VivekanandaAs we navigate the whirlwind of global evolution, marked by rapid technological strides and transformative socio-economic shifts, the imperative for adaptive legal frameworks becomes paramount.The CCC emerges as a beacon of progressive legal thought, aspiring to weave the rich tapestry of existing personal laws into a contemporary legal narrative, discarding antiquated notions that no longer serve the collective conscience.Instead of resorting to the age-old tactic of postponement or delay, marked by disputes and strife, it is imperative for the diverse and community-minded populace to unite and actively implement this legislation.This aspiration is in harmony with the constitutional ethos encapsulated in "We the People of India," celebrating the nation's intricate mosaic of cultures while advocating for an equitable legal edifice that ensures justice and equality for every citizen.The author is a Professor at Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.Read all the Latest NewsTrending NewsCricket NewsBollywood News,India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram.

Advertisement
Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.
First Published:Feb 11, 2024, 14:03:49 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next