Does Trump’s decision to pause ‘Project Freedom’ in Strait of Hormuz signal peace is near?

The United States’ newly launched maritime initiative in the Strait of Hormuz — “Project Freedom” — has been placed on hold within days of its announcement, as President Donald Trump pointed to progress in diplomatic engagement with Iran.

The development comes amid an already fragile ceasefire and continued hostilities at sea.

What is Project Freedom?

Project Freedom was formally announced on Sunday, (May 3, 2026), as a US-led initiative designed to enable commercial shipping to resume through the Strait of Hormuz.

The strategic waterway, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, has been effectively shut down since late February, when a US-Israeli military campaign against Iran triggered retaliatory measures from Tehran.

More from Explainers

Trump’s backing has made Asim Munir more dangerous, India must play its cards well

Is Israel the only disruptor in West Asia?

Since then Iran has moved to restrict access to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy flows. By threatening the deployment of naval mines, drones, missile systems, and fast-attack vessels, Tehran effectively halted maritime traffic through the corridor.

In response, the US has also moved to implement a naval blockade to restrict any vessels going and coming from Iran.

The closure had immediate global repercussions, as approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments pass through the strait.

Against this backdrop, Project Freedom was conceived as a means to break the deadlock. Trump described the initiative as a humanitarian effort “meant to free up people, companies, and Countries that have done absolutely nothing wrong”.

The goal was to assist stranded vessels and restore a degree of normalcy to global shipping without directly escalating the conflict.

How severe is the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz?

According to US Central Command, around 1,550 commercial vessels were trapped in the Gulf, with an estimated 22,500 mariners unable to proceed with their journeys. These vessels represented 87 different countries.

The prolonged standstill led to growing concerns about the welfare of crew members. US officials highlighted deteriorating conditions aboard ships, with reports indicating shortages of food and essential supplies.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that some sailors were “starving” and “isolated”.

The blockade has also triggered a sharp rise in energy prices. Oil markets reacted swiftly to the disruption, with prices climbing above $100 per barrel during the height of the crisis. The International Monetary Fund warned that even if hostilities ceased immediately, the economic aftershocks would take several months to stabilise.

The situation only escalated after sporadic attacks on vessels and ongoing disputes over safe passage.

How was the United States implementing Project Freedom?

The operational framework of Project Freedom relied heavily on US military capabilities. Central Command outlined a large-scale deployment that included guided-missile destroyers, over 100 aircraft operating across land and sea domains, unmanned systems, and approximately 15,000 service members.

US Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, indicated that American forces had engaged with multiple shipping companies and vessels to facilitate movement through the strait.

The approach involved both direct assistance and coordination with commercial operators to encourage the resumption of maritime traffic.

Although initial details were limited, subsequent updates suggested that US naval assets had begun operating within the Gulf and had transited the Strait of Hormuz in support of the initiative.

The United States also signalled that it was prepared to escort vessels, though it did not immediately confirm whether all ships would receive military protection.

Evidence of progress emerged when US officials reported that two American-flagged merchant vessels had successfully navigated the strait.

Additionally, shipping company Maersk confirmed that one of its ships, the Alliance Fairfax, had exited the Gulf under US military escort. However, these claims were contested by Iran, which maintained that no such crossings had taken place.

How did Iran respond to US' Project Freedom?

Iranian forces reportedly engaged US warships and commercial vessels using missiles, drones, and small attack boats. Tehran described these actions as defensive measures aimed at protecting its territorial waters and enforcing its control over the shipping route.

The United States, meanwhile, reported intercepting and neutralising several threats. According to American officials, US forces destroyed multiple Iranian small boats, as well as cruise missiles and drones targeting vessels in the region.

Helicopters supporting the operation were also used to counter perceived threats to civilian shipping.

Iran denied that its assets had been destroyed and accused the United States of escalating tensions through its military presence.

The United Arab Emirates has also reported attacks on its vessels and warning of escalating threats to its security. Abu Dhabi has asserted its “full and legitimate right” to respond to any aggression, while Iran has rejected these claims and defended its actions.

Iranian authorities insisted that any vessel seeking to pass through the strait must adhere to routes approved by Tehran, warning that non-compliance would result in decisive action.

The UAE also reported that a tanker associated with its national oil company had been targeted by drones, while a South Korean cargo vessel was reportedly struck near Emirati waters. Although no casualties were reported in these cases.

Why did Trump decide to pause the initiative?

The decision to suspend Project Freedom came just two days after its launch.

On Tuesday (May 5, 2026), Trump announced that the operation would be halted temporarily, citing progress in negotiations with Iran.

In his statement, he said, “We have mutually agreed that, while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect, Project Freedom ... will be paused for a short period of time to see whether or not the Agreement can be finalised and signed.”

Trump also indicated that the decision was influenced by requests from Pakistan, which has been acting as an intermediary in talks between Washington and Tehran.

Despite the pause, the broader US strategy appears unchanged. Officials emphasised that the blockade of the strait would continue, and there was no indication that military readiness in the region would be scaled back.

Rubio reinforced this position, stating that the primary objectives of the US military campaign had already been achieved. Referring to the broader operation launched in February, he said, “Operation Epic Fury is concluded,” adding, “We're not cheering for an additional situation to occur.”

How has Iran responded to the pause?

Iranian state media outlets characterised the move as evidence of American failure, asserting that Washington had been unable to achieve its goals in reopening the strait.

A statement carried by Iran’s INSA news agency claimed that Trump had halted the operation “following firm positions and warnings from Iran.” The same statement described the pause as a retreat after unsuccessful attempts to enforce maritime access.

Iranian officials have consistently argued that the United States’ actions have undermined security in the region. Tehran has also accused Washington of exacerbating tensions through its blockade of Iranian ports, suggesting that the situation is unsustainable for all parties involved.

At the same time, Iran has maintained that it retains the right to control access to the Strait of Hormuz and to respond to any perceived threats. Its leadership has reiterated that its military actions are aimed at countering what it describes as American aggression.

What is the current status of the ceasefire?

The pause in Project Freedom does not signal an end to the ceasefire between the United States and Iran. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth clarified that the truce remains in effect, describing the maritime initiative as separate from the broader agreement.

“Right now the ceasefire certainly holds, but we're going to be watching very, very closely,” Hegseth said, indicating that the situation remains under constant review.

General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided additional context by noting that recent Iranian actions, including attacks on vessels and US forces, had not crossed the threshold required to resume large-scale combat operations.

Since the ceasefire was agreed on April 8, Iran has reportedly carried out multiple attacks on commercial shipping and seized container ships, while also targeting US assets.

Trump, when asked about the conditions under which the ceasefire might be broken, responded, “They know what not to do.”

With inputs from agencies