Advertisement

Walking a Tightrope: Pakistan's Iran dilemma deepens as Houthi attacks put Saudi ties to the test

The widening US-Iran conflict and Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia have placed Pakistan in a strategic bind, forcing Islamabad to balance defence commitments to Riyadh against its fragile but vital relationship with neighbouring Iran.

Advertisement
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman greets Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif . File image- AFP
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman greets Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif . File image- AFP
Chandan Prakash|Jul 19, 2026, 00:12:17 IST

The widening confrontation between the United States and Iran is creating difficult choices far beyond the Gulf and perhaps nowhere is the strategic dilemma sharper than in Pakistan. As Iran-backed Houthi rebels step up attacks on Saudi Arabia and Washington intensifies its military campaign against Tehran, Islamabad finds itself pulled between two partners it can ill afford to alienate—Saudi Arabia, its longstanding financial and security ally and Iran, its immediate neighbour sharing a nearly 900-kilometre border.

Advertisement

For years, Pakistan has sought to avoid becoming entangled in West Asia rivalries, preferring to position itself as a bridge between Riyadh and Tehran. But the latest escalation is testing whether that balancing act can survive if proxy attacks evolve into a wider regional war.

The question has become even more pressing after renewed Houthi attacks on Saudi territory revived scrutiny of a decades-old defence understanding between Islamabad and Riyadh, raising speculation over whether Pakistan could be expected to assist the kingdom if the conflict escalates further.

worldMore from World

Defence commitments versus regional diplomacy

Pakistan's relationship with Saudi Arabia extends well beyond diplomacy. The kingdom has repeatedly provided financial assistance during Pakistan's economic crises, hosted millions of Pakistani expatriate workers whose remittances are critical to the country's economy and maintained close military ties with Islamabad.

The sudden activation of Iran's Yemeni proxy has pushed the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) between Islamabad and Riyadh to the forefront of global defence analysis. Under this long-established security framework, Pakistan maintains a foundational commitment to safeguard the territorial integrity and holy sites of Saudi Arabia against external aggression.

Advertisement

However, the current crisis introduces severe complexities. Islamabad has traditionally walked a fine line by asserting that its military cooperation is strictly defensive and geographically confined within Saudi borders. If Riyadh keeps its military focus strictly on neutralising Houthi launch sites inside Yemen, Pakistan’s footprint will likely remain restrained to intelligence sharing, air defence deployment, and logistical support.

However, if the Houthi strikes escalate to systematically target critical Saudi infrastructure or disrupt essential Red Sea trade arteries like the Bab el-Mandeb strait, the absolute pressure on Islamabad to deploy kinetic naval and air assets will become immense.

Trump's pressure campaign narrows Islamabad's options

The latest US offensive against Iran has further complicated Pakistan's diplomatic calculations.

President Donald Trump's decision to expand military operations against Iranian infrastructure has increased fears that the conflict could spill beyond Iran into neighbouring states. Iran-backed Houthis have already broadened the theatre of confrontation by attacking Saudi Arabia, raising the possibility that Gulf partners may seek greater regional security cooperation if hostilities continue.

Advertisement

For Islamabad, such a scenario presents competing strategic interests.

Supporting Saudi Arabia too openly risks undermining relations with Iran and exposing Pakistan's western frontier to greater instability. Remaining neutral, however, could strain ties with Riyadh at a time when Pakistan continues to rely on Saudi financial support and energy supplies.

Pakistan has therefore maintained a cautious public position, condemning attacks on civilian infrastructure while simultaneously urging restraint, dialogue and an immediate de-escalation of hostilities.

A balancing act that may become harder to sustain

Analysts argue that Pakistan's traditional policy of neutrality may become increasingly difficult if the conflict continues to widen.

Unlike previous rounds of regional tensions, the current confrontation is no longer confined to military installations. Attacks have increasingly targeted ports, energy facilities, desalination plants and shipping routes linked to the Strait of Hormuz, raising the economic stakes for countries across the region.

Pakistan has long sought to remain a bridge between Riyadh and Tehran rather than choose between them. But as the US-Iran conflict expands and Houthi attacks place fresh scrutiny on Islamabad's defence ties with Saudi Arabia, preserving that neutrality may become increasingly difficult. The real test for Pakistan will not be whether it can avoid the conflict, but whether it can prevent the conflict from reshaping its regional partnerships.

Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.

Chandan Prakash writes on politics, international affairs, economy and health. He can be contacted at Chandan.Prakash@nw18.com

First Published:Jul 18, 2026, 23:51:40 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending Stories

'See me after class!': UK education secretary Lucy Powell mocked by Tories over grammar gaffe

UK Education Secretary Lucy Powell faced Conservative criticism after a grammar mistake in a social media post went viral, drawing jibes from Tory MPs just days after her appointment to the role.
2 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next