Walking a Tightrope: Pakistan's Iran dilemma deepens as Houthi attacks put Saudi ties to the test
The widening US-Iran conflict and Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia have placed Pakistan in a strategic bind, forcing Islamabad to balance defence commitments to Riyadh against its fragile but vital relationship with neighbouring Iran.

The widening confrontation between the United States and Iran is creating difficult choices far beyond the Gulf and perhaps nowhere is the strategic dilemma sharper than in Pakistan. As Iran-backed Houthi rebels step up attacks on Saudi Arabia and Washington intensifies its military campaign against Tehran, Islamabad finds itself pulled between two partners it can ill afford to alienate—Saudi Arabia, its longstanding financial and security ally and Iran, its immediate neighbour sharing a nearly 900-kilometre border.
For years, Pakistan has sought to avoid becoming entangled in West Asia rivalries, preferring to position itself as a bridge between Riyadh and Tehran. But the latest escalation is testing whether that balancing act can survive if proxy attacks evolve into a wider regional war.
The question has become even more pressing after renewed Houthi attacks on Saudi territory revived scrutiny of a decades-old defence understanding between Islamabad and Riyadh, raising speculation over whether Pakistan could be expected to assist the kingdom if the conflict escalates further.
Defence commitments versus regional diplomacy
Pakistan's relationship with Saudi Arabia extends well beyond diplomacy. The kingdom has repeatedly provided financial assistance during Pakistan's economic crises, hosted millions of Pakistani expatriate workers whose remittances are critical to the country's economy and maintained close military ties with Islamabad.
The sudden activation of Iran's Yemeni proxy has pushed the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) between Islamabad and Riyadh to the forefront of global defence analysis. Under this long-established security framework, Pakistan maintains a foundational commitment to safeguard the territorial integrity and holy sites of Saudi Arabia against external aggression.
However, the current crisis introduces severe complexities. Islamabad has traditionally walked a fine line by asserting that its military cooperation is strictly defensive and geographically confined within Saudi borders. If Riyadh keeps its military focus strictly on neutralising Houthi launch sites inside Yemen, Pakistan’s footprint will likely remain restrained to intelligence sharing, air defence deployment, and logistical support.
However, if the Houthi strikes escalate to systematically target critical Saudi infrastructure or disrupt essential Red Sea trade arteries like the Bab el-Mandeb strait, the absolute pressure on Islamabad to deploy kinetic naval and air assets will become immense.
Trump's pressure campaign narrows Islamabad's options
The latest US offensive against Iran has further complicated Pakistan's diplomatic calculations.
President Donald Trump's decision to expand military operations against Iranian infrastructure has increased fears that the conflict could spill beyond Iran into neighbouring states. Iran-backed Houthis have already broadened the theatre of confrontation by attacking Saudi Arabia, raising the possibility that Gulf partners may seek greater regional security cooperation if hostilities continue.
For Islamabad, such a scenario presents competing strategic interests.
Supporting Saudi Arabia too openly risks undermining relations with Iran and exposing Pakistan's western frontier to greater instability. Remaining neutral, however, could strain ties with Riyadh at a time when Pakistan continues to rely on Saudi financial support and energy supplies.
Pakistan has therefore maintained a cautious public position, condemning attacks on civilian infrastructure while simultaneously urging restraint, dialogue and an immediate de-escalation of hostilities.
A balancing act that may become harder to sustain
Analysts argue that Pakistan's traditional policy of neutrality may become increasingly difficult if the conflict continues to widen.
Unlike previous rounds of regional tensions, the current confrontation is no longer confined to military installations. Attacks have increasingly targeted ports, energy facilities, desalination plants and shipping routes linked to the Strait of Hormuz, raising the economic stakes for countries across the region.
Pakistan has long sought to remain a bridge between Riyadh and Tehran rather than choose between them. But as the US-Iran conflict expands and Houthi attacks place fresh scrutiny on Islamabad's defence ties with Saudi Arabia, preserving that neutrality may become increasingly difficult. The real test for Pakistan will not be whether it can avoid the conflict, but whether it can prevent the conflict from reshaping its regional partnerships.
Chandan Prakash writes on politics, international affairs, economy and health. He can be contacted at Chandan.Prakash@nw18.com

Marco Rubio says he 'would expect India to be concerned' over Trump's pharma tariffs
Trump renews China election interference claims, but files point to Russia's larger role
'See me after class!': UK education secretary Lucy Powell mocked by Tories over grammar gaffe
Jaishankar meets Canada's Anita Anand, discusses bilateral cooperation and shared interests
Trump says US will hit Iranian infrastructure after every attack on ships in Strait of Hormuz
