Intel’s CEO Pat Gelsinger's forced exit may lead to new discussions on chipmaker's sale to partners, rivals

The abrupt resignation of Pat Gelsinger as Intel's CEO has ignited fresh conversations about the company’s future, with speculation swirling over potential deals and restructuring. 

Gelsinger, who led the chipmaking giant during a challenging turnaround period, had firmly opposed splitting Intel’s operations or pursuing acquisitions. Now, with new leadership on the horizon, options once deemed off the table are being reconsidered.

Intel’s board has explored a variety of possibilities in recent months, including private equity investments and separating its manufacturing and design divisions. 

Once a chip giant, Intel’s struggle continues to worsen

Gelsinger’s departure, reportedly under board pressure, could make these discussions more feasible. Financial heavyweights like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs are already advising Intel on its strategic options, which may now find a more receptive audience.

More from Tech

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger forced to retire after 40 years at the company, as chipmaker continues to struggle

Intel’s CHIPS Act funding reduced from $8.5 billion to $7.85 billion because of recent military contract

Intel has long been a dominant force in the semiconductor world but has struggled to maintain its edge in a rapidly evolving market. Rivals like NVIDIA and AMD have surged ahead, leaving Intel grappling with sliding sales and a costly manufacturing strategy. 

The company’s dual role as both a chip designer and manufacturer has become a financial strain, especially as it attempts to compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) in the foundry business, and with NVIDIA and AMD in the AI chips business. 

Under Gelsinger, Intel pursued some radical cost-cutting measures, including job cuts, paused plant construction in Europe, and a suspension of its dividend. 

However, a poor earnings report in August, including a surprise loss, pushed the board to consider more drastic moves. Among them are divestitures and even splitting the company into separate manufacturing and product-design entities.

Potential partnerships and acquisitions on the horizon

Intel’s new leadership could bring a fresh perspective on partnerships and acquisitions. One option involves splitting its foundry and product businesses, a strategy that could make the more profitable product unit appealing to buyers like Qualcomm. While Qualcomm has expressed interest in parts of Intel in the past, complexities in acquiring the entire company have kept talks from progressing.

Other suitors, like Broadcom, may also reassess potential opportunities. However, any significant merger would likely face intense regulatory scrutiny, as seen in past attempts within the chip industry.

Selling specific assets is another avenue being explored. Intel’s Altera unit, acquired in 2015, has drawn interest from private equity firms and companies like Lattice Semiconductor. Similarly, Mobileye, a self-driving technology firm majority-owned by Intel, remains a candidate for divestiture, with Intel contemplating options to sell portions of its stake.

Additionally, Apollo Global Management’s previous multibillion-dollar investment proposal could see renewed momentum. Apollo, already a stakeholder in an Intel chip plant in Ireland, could be looking for deeper involvement.

What’s next for Intel’s legacy?

As Intel navigates this uncertain period, Gelsinger’s departure signals the end of an era defined by ambitious turnaround plans and significant financial challenges. Whether through strategic divestitures, acquisitions, or a complete overhaul of its business model, the company faces tough decisions that could redefine its role in the semiconductor industry.

Intel’s board must weigh the risks of breaking up a storied company that once ruled the chip market against the potential rewards of adapting to a highly competitive landscape. Whatever path Intel chooses, the decisions made in the coming months will shape its legacy and its ability to compete in a tech world that is more demanding than ever.