Olga Tokarczuk and the AI controversy that has left the literary world without answers

In early May, Olga Tokarczuk gave an interview at the Impact Congress in Poznań, published in Polish, that might have stayed there had a writer named Maks Sipowicz not translated several passages and shared them on Bluesky. In those passages, Tokarczuk described buying a premium subscription to a language model, asking it to suggest period-appropriate songs for her characters to dance to, prompting it,  addressing it as "darling" — to help develop scenes, and calling the technology "an advantage of unbelievable proportion" for literary fiction. Within hours the excerpts were circulating widely, and the word most commonly attached to them was "admission."

The following afternoon, Tokarczuk issued a statement through her publisher, Riverhead. She had not written her forthcoming novel, due in Polish this autumn, using AI. She used AI as a tool for faster preliminary research, always verified independently. "I am sometimes inspired by dreams," she added, "but before this sentence too is cornered and torn to pieces by the experts, I hasten to report that they are my own dreams."

More from Lifestyle

The statement did not settle matters. Writers are using these tools. The norms governing what requires disclosure and where the line falls between research aid and something more troubling have not been established, and nobody in the literary world quite knows how to work around it.

A story that defied all odds

Tokarczuk's statement came on the same day Literary Hub reported on a rather different controversy. A short story called The Serpent in the Grove, attributed to a writer named Jamir Nazir, had been selected as the Caribbean regional finalist for the 2026 Commonwealth Short Story Prize and published in Granta. The prize began with 7,806 entries. The panel, chaired by the novelist Louise Doughty, praised Nazir's story for its "precise yet richly evocative" language.

Ethan Mollick, a Wharton professor who studies AI adoption, ran the story through Pangram, a detection programme with a claimed accuracy rate of 99 percent. The result came back at 100 percent AI-generated. Mollick noted characteristic patterns: sentences built on constructions that large language models favour, an unusually high density of simile, three-part lists throughout.

Beyond the text, Nazir's digital presence was thin — a self-published poetry collection from 2018 and a LinkedIn profile devoted largely to enthusiasm for AI tools. The Commonwealth Foundation said it was reviewing its selection process. Granta said it was "alarmed."

The case raises questions beyond one prize. A panel of experienced judges read a story and found it worthy of a major literary award. The story appears, on available evidence, to have been generated by a language model. The literary establishment's capacity to distinguish machine-produced writing from human writing, when attributed to a plausible author and presented in the right context, may be considerably more limited than it would like to believe.

There is no answer

Earlier this spring, Hachette Book Group cancelled the US publication of a horror novel, Shy Girl by Mia Ballard, and withdrew its UK edition. The book has already sold close to 2,000 copies — after allegations it was AI-generated. The publisher moved only after the New York Times presented evidence. Ballard denied personally using AI, saying a freelance editor had introduced AI-generated material without her knowledge. It was the first time a major publisher had publicly cancelled a contracted title over AI content concerns.

No major commercial publisher currently screens submissions for AI content. In both the Shy Girl case and the Granta controversy, readers and researchers working through social media did the investigative work. The literary establishment followed where the internet led.

The literary world is in jeopardy. There is an institutional failure. In her Poznań interview, Tokarczuk also said she believes her current novel will be her last, because readers are drifting from complex literary fiction and the economics of serious long-form work have become untenable.