X to drop block feature, says Elon Musk: Why has this angered users?
Elon Musk has said X, formerly Twitter, will chuck blocking, except for direct messages. The billionaire’s plan has raised widespread concerns among users, with many pointing out that removing the feature could subject more people to online bullying and abuse

A blocked account cannot send messages to the blocker either.Mute only removes a user’s posts from the timeline of the account they want to avoid. It does not stop the account from following the user or replying to their tweets, which will be visible to other people.To put it simply, you will not see them but the muted users can see you.According to CNBC, X users have often employed the block feature to ignore ads from specific brands or promoters on the platform. People also block accounts as a form of boycott.After Musk’s tweet, Windows Central editor-in-chief Daniel Rubino, as per The Verge, said, “Block is a form of moderation for users”.Why is the block feature important?Many have raised concerns that discarding the block feature would make people vulnerable to online harassment, stalking, trolling and being exposed to abusive content.Some said that it would take away users’ ability to filter spam accounts.Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, an investor in Musk-owned Twitter, wrote in a post, “X should really solve the bots & spam problems before removing blocks. Just my 0.02.”Musk’s proposed plan was severely criticised, with one user calling it a "huge mistake" as there are "toxic people" on the platform with whom people did not want to interact.One of the users wrote, "Block creates a safe border. I block the vicious people and the spammers”.“I utilise the block feature as a boundary to keep myself and my family safe from would-be stalkers & predators who politically target me and want to harm or frighten me,” another user commented.[caption id="attachment_13015562" align="alignnone" width="640"]

Elon Musk's move proposing to remove the block feature on X has been widely criticised. Reuters (Representational Image)[/caption]The Auschwitz Memorial account, which is often a target of antisemitic hatred, denounced Musk's decision in a long post.“Failing to address the antisemitic and Holocaust denial comments that appear under our posts commemorating the victims of Auschwitz would be a disservice to their memory. We've chosen to block users who promote denial and hatred. This decision stems from our deep dedication to our mission. We need a secure space to do this.”The account said that social media platforms should “shoulder significant moral responsibility” and “actively counter hate speech and halt its normalisation”.“Blocking users isn't a mere action; it's a practical measure. Often, reporting accounts that spread hostility remains an unanswered call. Blocking provides a way to protect the memory of people who suffered and were murdered in Auschwitz,” it wrote.
As BBC noted, “the block button is an established tool for those who feel attacked, bullied or simply want to shut out an account with whom they have a strong disagreement”.Speaking to CNBC, Louis Jones, a media and advertising executive, called Musk’s plan “concerning”, saying his “lax approach to free speech,” will probably have e a “double effect”. Jones said this would lead to further bullying on the platform as well as suppress the “free speech” of users who are frequent targets of bullies and predators”.“It’s a downward spiral that cannot be good for the long term success of X.”Will Elon Musk bump off blocking?It remains to be seen if Musk will actually walk the talk on removing the block feature, a decision that seems highly unpopular across quarters.However, as several reports pointed out, the Tesla executive has previously ignored, reversed course, or just not followed through with his ideas.Moreover, there is an additional challenge awaiting X if it takes away the users’ power to block accounts. As per BBC, if the feature is "deleted", it could potentially violate the terms and conditions of stores like Apple's App Store and Google Play.Google Play developers must provide “an in-app system for blocking [user-generated content] and users,”, while iOS developers must offer “the ability to block abusive users from the service”, noted The Verge.Although Apple’s language is vague, a user posted an iOS rejection message on X saying that “users need a mechanism to block abusive users.”As American social activist Monica Lewinsky asked Musk to “rethink removing the block feature” because “it’s a critical tool to keep people safe online", Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino responded: “Our users’ safety on X is our number one priority. And we’re building something better than the current state of block and mute. Please keep the feedback coming.”If Musk is looking for some solace amidst the backlash, he can find it in former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s comment, who replied to him, saying “100. Mute only.”With inputs from agencies
Cruise missiles, drones and more... The deadly arsenal of the Houthis
Why India may not witness a medal rush at 2026 Commonwealth Games
Delhi Police asks personnel to wear uniform: What the law says on cops in plainclothes during protests
Military drones & police check-ups: How Sri Lanka is fighting against worst dengue outbreak in a decade
How Facebook job ad lured 2 Karnataka men into Myanmar cyber scam camp
