Why has Nepal removed the disputed map from its new coin? Is this a signal to reset with India?

Nepal has approved a redesign of one of its most commonly used coins, removing a politically sensitive map that has been at the heart of a long-running territorial dispute with India.

While the government has presented the move as part of a routine overhaul of the country's coinage, the move has raised questions and prompted speculation that Kathmandu may be attempting to reset the tone of its relationship with New Delhi without altering its official territorial position.

The decision comes at a time when India and Nepal are seeking to deepen cooperation in areas such as trade, energy, connectivity and cross-border infrastructure after years in which symbolic disagreements frequently overshadowed practical engagement.

What does the redesign comprise?

Nepal's Council of Ministers, last week, approved a proposal from the Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) to mint newly designed one-rupee and two-rupee coins.

More from Explainers

What’s fuelling Gen Z’s anger against millennial leader Balen Shah in Nepal?

Indus Water Treaty row: Asim Munir’s failed gamble

The most significant aspect of the decision is the redesign of the one-rupee coin, which will no longer display Nepal's revised political map that incorporated the disputed territories of Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani.

Instead, the reverse side of the new one-rupee coin will feature the Lo Ghyakar Monastery, also known as Ghar Gumba, located in Marang village in Mustang district. Considered one of Nepal's oldest monasteries, the eighth-century Buddhist site is regarded as an important part of the country's cultural and religious heritage.

Cabinet sources told PTI news agency that the two-rupee coin, however, will continue to retain the previously approved political map. The Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) has maintained that the redesign was driven primarily by technical and manufacturing considerations rather than politics.

According to NRB spokesperson Guru Prasad Paudel, the bank proposed fresh designs as part of a broader effort to modernise Nepal's circulating coins by reducing their size and weight while also changing the materials used in their production.

Under the new specifications, the one-rupee coin will weigh 3.2 grammes instead of the existing four grammes, while the two-rupee coin will be reduced from five grammes to 3.8 grammes.

The redesigned coins will also be produced using steel instead of mixed metals, resulting in a steel-white appearance replacing the earlier yellow finish.

Officials have also pointed to practical limitations associated with the smaller coin size. According to the explanation offered by the central bank, reproducing the intricate outline of Nepal's revised political map on a reduced surface would compromise clarity and legibility, making the redesign necessary.

What is the India-Nepal border dispute?

The dispute centres on a roughly 370-square-kilometre area located near the India-Nepal-China tri-junction in Uttarakhand's Pithoragarh district. At the heart of the disagreement lies differing interpretations of the 1816 Sugauli Treaty signed between British India and the Kingdom of Nepal.

Nepal argues that the Mahakali, also known as the Kali River, originates from Limpiyadhura, which lies further west. Based on that interpretation, Kathmandu maintains that Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani fall within Nepalese territory.

India disputes that interpretation. New Delhi maintains that the Kali River begins near springs located close to Kalapani village and therefore considers all three areas to be part of Indian territory.

India has also maintained administrative control and a security presence in the region through the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) since the 1962 war.

Although the disagreement dates back more than two centuries, it entered a particularly contentious phase in 2020.

Tensions escalated sharply in May that year after India inaugurated a strategically important road connecting Dharchula to Lipulekh Pass. The route significantly improved access to the Lipulekh Pass used by pilgrims travelling on the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra while also carrying strategic importance because of its proximity to the India-China border.

Kathmandu objected to the project, arguing that the road passed through territory claimed by Nepal.

Soon afterwards, the then-government led by Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli unveiled a revised political map that formally incorporated Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura within Nepal's national boundaries. The map was endorsed through constitutional processes and quickly became one of the defining symbols of Nepal's territorial position.

That revised map was later incorporated into official state representations, including the one-rupee coin, making it a highly visible assertion of Nepal's claim.

For India, however, the map had no legal validity and did not alter New Delhi's position that the territories remain part of India.

A technical redesign — or a diplomatic message?

Coins and banknotes are among the most recognisable expressions of state identity and sovereignty. Every design choice — from portraits and monuments to national emblems and maps — carries symbolic meaning because these objects circulate daily among millions of people.

It is for this reason that many diplomatic observers believe the removal of the disputed map from Nepal's most widely circulated coin represents more than a simple design adjustment.

By replacing the contentious political symbol with the image of the Lo Ghyakar Monastery, Kathmandu appears to have opted for a culturally significant national landmark that is unlikely to generate diplomatic friction while continuing to celebrate Nepal's historical heritage.

Such an approach would allow Kathmandu to reduce a recurring symbolic irritant in bilateral relations without abandoning its long-held claims over Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura.

Yet the decision has also exposed political divisions within Nepal itself. Among the strongest critics has been Nepali Communist Party senior leader Bhim Rawal, who questioned the government's decision and demanded an immediate explanation.

“If the government led by Prime Minister Balen Shah has indeed decided to remove the map of Nepal, including Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani, from the one-rupee coin and replace it with the image of the Lo Ghyakar Monastery, it will constitute another serious anti-national decision and a blow to Nepal’s territorial integrity,” Rawal said.

Rawal also called on both the government and the ruling Rastriya Swatantra Party to publicly clarify the decision, arguing that removing the map from official currency raises serious questions regarding Nepal's commitment to its territorial claims.

His criticism illustrates the difficult balancing act facing the current administration. On one hand, nationalist sentiment surrounding Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani remains deeply embedded in Nepal's political discourse.

On the other hand, successive governments have increasingly recognised the importance of maintaining stable relations with India, Nepal's largest trading partner, principal transit route and biggest market for electricity exports.

Currency occupies a unique position in a country's public life. Unlike official statements or policy documents, coins and banknotes are handled by citizens every day and are widely regarded as representations of national identity, history and sovereignty.

How is the new Balen Shah govt approaching India?

Following the March general election earlier this year, Balendra "Balen" Shah, the 36-year-old structural engineer and former Mayor of Kathmandu, assumed office as prime minister after leading the Rastriya Swatantra Party to power.

His election marked one of the most significant political transitions in Nepal in recent years.

Shah secured a decisive parliamentary victory in Jhapa-5, defeating former PM Oli, and became the world's youngest serving head of government when he took office on March 27, 2026.

His rise followed the youth-led political movement that reshaped Nepal's political landscape after the 2025 protests, bringing a new generation of leadership into government.

While Shah had built a reputation during his tenure as Kathmandu mayor through highly visible nationalist positions — including displaying "Greater Nepal" maps in municipal offices and restricting Indian films — his approach as PM has been markedly different.

His government has increasingly framed foreign policy through the lens of economic delivery rather than symbolic confrontation.

Instead of allowing longstanding political disagreements to dominate bilateral relations, the administration has prioritised initiatives capable of generating investment, employment, energy revenue and improved cross-border connectivity.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi was among the first international leaders to congratulate Shah after he assumed office, a gesture that many viewed as reflecting New Delhi's willingness to build a constructive relationship with Nepal's new leadership.

The current administration's broader approach suggests an effort to separate domestic political messaging from long-term strategic and economic priorities.

What defines India-Nepal relations?

In recent months, economic engagement has become one of the strongest pillars supporting India-Nepal relations. Trade between the two countries reached US$9.38 billion during the 2025-26 financial year, underlining India's continued importance to Nepal's economy.

India remains Nepal's principal trading partner and transit gateway, accounting for more than 60 per cent of the country's external trade while absorbing over 80 per cent of Nepal's exports.

Beyond merchandise trade, both governments have continued to expand cooperation across transport, logistics and digital connectivity.

Integrated Check Posts (ICPs), cross-border railway projects and digital payment linkages between India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Nepal Clearing House Limited (NCHL) are helping streamline cross-border commerce, tourism and remittances.

These initiatives are aimed at reducing transit costs, improving logistics and strengthening economic integration between the neighbouring countries.

For Nepal, improved connectivity offers opportunities to boost exports and attract investment. For India, closer economic integration supports regional connectivity while reinforcing long-term strategic ties with its Himalayan neighbour.

Perhaps the clearest example of the growing economic partnership is the rapid expansion of energy cooperation. Nepal's vast hydropower potential has increasingly become the centrepiece of bilateral engagement, offering mutual economic and strategic benefits.

During the 13th Joint Steering Committee meeting held in Pokhara earlier this month, officials from both countries agreed to significantly strengthen cross-border electricity cooperation.

The meeting resulted in Nepal's permitted electricity exports to India increasing from 1,100 MW to 1,650 MW. Import capacity during Nepal's dry season was also expanded to 1,400 MW, improving energy security during periods of lower domestic generation.

Both governments are simultaneously accelerating work on major transmission infrastructure, including the Gorakhpur-Butwal 400 kV transmission line and joint venture projects covering the Dodhgara-Bareilly and Inaruwa-Purnea corridors.

These projects support the long-term objective of enabling Nepal to export up to 10,000 MW of electricity to India over the next decade.

For Kathmandu, hydropower represents one of its greatest economic opportunities, offering the potential to reduce the country's trade deficit while generating substantial export earnings.

What about influence from China?

Nepal's foreign policy has traditionally involved balancing relations between its two giant neighbours — India and China.

Under previous governments, Kathmandu often alternated between closer engagement with Beijing and New Delhi, with domestic political developments sometimes influencing the direction of foreign policy.

The Shah administration, however, has sought to pursue what many describe as a more economically driven and pragmatic approach.

While maintaining engagement with China, the government has reportedly exercised caution regarding financing under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), favouring grant-based infrastructure assistance and softer financing arrangements over high-interest commercial borrowing.

At the same time, the administration has acknowledged the practical realities of Nepal's geography.

India remains Nepal's only realistic large-scale market for surplus electricity exports and continues to provide the country's most accessible route to international seaports for overseas trade.

Security cooperation between the two countries has also continued through established bilateral mechanisms addressing open-border management, cross-border crime and regional stability.

With inputs from agencies