Advertisement

US rejects ICC jurisdiction over Americans, vows not to cooperate with investigations

Justice Department tells The Hague-based court it has no authority over US citizens, says Washington will neither cooperate with investigations nor extradite Americans for trial

Advertisement
JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND - JULY 01: U.S. President Donald Trump stops to speak to the media before boarding Air Force One on July 01, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to North Dakota to attend the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library dedication on his first trip using the new Air Force One aircraft gifted to the U.S. by Qatar's government.   Andrew Harnik/Getty Images/AFP (Photo by Andrew Harnik / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND - JULY 01: U.S. President Donald Trump stops to speak to the media before boarding Air Force One on July 01, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to North Dakota to attend the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library dedication on his first trip using the new Air Force One aircraft gifted to the U.S. by Qatar's government. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images/AFP (Photo by Andrew Harnik / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
FP News Desk|Jul 03, 2026, 13:09:30 IST

In an escalation of tensions between Washington and The Hague, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has formally notified the International Criminal Court (ICC) that the United States completely rejects the tribunal’s jurisdiction over American citizens and will refuse to cooperate with any of its investigations.

The mandate was delivered via an official letter from Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche to ICC President Judge Tomoko Akane. In the communication, the DOJ characterised any attempt by the international body to assert authority over US persons as "illegitimate, unlawful, and a direct affront to the sovereignty of the United States."

Advertisement

A treaty cannot bind the non-consenting

At the core of the US legal argument is the foundational principle of international treaty law: a nation cannot be bound by an agreement it has not signed.

The United States is notably not a party to the Rome Statute, the 1998 treaty that established the permanent war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands.

worldMore from World

"As a matter of international law, a treaty cannot bind a non-consenting country," Blanche wrote. "Accordingly, the ICC has no jurisdiction over Americans—anywhere in the world."

The DOJ went on to launch an extraordinary rhetorical attack on the court’s operational integrity, stating:


  • The ICC has acted in an "increasingly lawless and illegitimate manner."

  • A record of "selective enforcement" undermines the body's institutional neutrality.

  • "Credible allegations of internal misconduct" raise serious doubts regarding its impartiality and credibility.

The scope of non-cooperation

The letter explicitly draws upon the American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002—a federal law passed by Congress that expressly repudiates the ICC’s reach over U.S. personnel and authorizes the president to use "all means necessary" to liberate any American detained by the court.

Advertisement

Moving forward, the DOJ declared a policy of total non-compliance:


  • The US will reject any ICC inquiry, summons, investigation, or ongoing legal proceeding.

  •  The US will not extradite or transfer any American citizen to face trial in The Hague.

  • The US government will actively oppose efforts by third-party nations to detain or hand over American citizens to the ICC.

The sudden legal firewall arrives amid heightened scrutiny over international law and U.S. military operations abroad. Legal experts note that the preemptive posture safeguards U.S. government officials, military service members, and civilians from potential political prosecutions by foreign entities.

"The United States will not subordinate the liberty and security of our people to a foreign tribunal in The Hague with no accountability to any electorate or fidelity to the Constitution," Blanche concluded.

The ICC has yet to issue a formal response to the Justice Department’s letter.

Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.
First Published:Jul 03, 2026, 13:09:30 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending Stories

Marco Rubio says he 'would expect India to be concerned' over Trump's pharma tariffs

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged India's concerns over Donald Trump's proposed pharmaceutical tariffs, saying Washington is seeking greater domestic manufacturing while remaining engaged with New Delhi.
2 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next