Civilian seafarers must not become casualties of geopolitics

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar lodged a strong diplomatic protest with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio following a US Navy military strike in the Gulf of Oman that killed three Indian mariners. During a phone call on Friday evening (12 June 2026), Jaishankar explicitly told Rubio that “such lethal actions against commercial shipping are not justified”. The incident, which resulted in the tragic deaths of engine fitter Shivanand Chaurasiya, deck cadet Aditya Sharma, and chief engineer Patnala Suresh, severely compromised maritime safety.

Prior to the phone call, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) twice summoned the US Chargé d’Affaires in New Delhi, Jason Meeks. The MEA lodged a strong protest against the use of lethal force, warning that these attacks directly undermine the safety and stability of international maritime commerce. India conveyed in unequivocal terms that the United States’ military strikes on foreign-flagged commercial vessels carrying Indian seafarers in the Gulf of Oman are deeply condemnable.

More from Opinion

By unilaterally enforcing a naval blockade and firing precision munitions into the engine rooms of commercial ships, US forces have endangered civilian lives, disregarded international maritime law, and severely compromised regional stability. Despite American claims that the vessel defied instructions while violating a naval blockade, the use of precision munitions on a civilian merchant ship is highly condemnable.

Violation of Maritime Law and Neutrality

The bedrock of global commerce relies on the safe passage of civilian merchant vessels. Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and customary international humanitarian law, civilian ships and their crews enjoy protected status unless they are directly participating in hostilities. Indian sailors, who comprise a significant percentage of the global seafaring workforce, operate as neutral actors facilitating global trade. Targeting a vessel crewed by these mariners violates the principle of distinction, which strictly forbids attacks on civilians.

The reported incidents involving military actions near commercial vessels staffed by civilian seafarers raise urgent concerns regarding the protection of neutral workers in volatile regions. Any use of force that jeopardises the safety of merchant mariners, such as those from India who form a critical part of the global maritime workforce, represents a significant challenge to established international norms. International maritime law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), emphasises the importance of freedom of navigation and the immunity of civilian vessels from targeted aggression.

The Illusion of ‘Collateral Damage’

Apologists for military missteps often categorise such tragedies as unavoidable collateral damage or identification errors in high-stakes conflict zones. This defence is ethically and operationally unacceptable for a global superpower. The United States possesses the most sophisticated maritime domain awareness, radar and satellite identification systems in the world. When the US military fires upon a merchant vessel without definitive verification of its hostile intent, it exhibits criminal negligence. Labelling the loss of innocent lives as an administrative oversight erodes the moral authority the US claims to uphold on the global stage.

From a humanitarian perspective, these actions are deeply concerning. Merchant sailors are essential civilian workers who maintain global supply chains. When geopolitical tensions escalate into kinetic military posturing in commercial shipping lanes, these individuals are placed in extreme danger through no fault of their own. Ensuring a safe working environment for seafarers is not only a labour rights issue but also a fundamental humanitarian necessity that must be respected by all global powers.

Geopolitical and Economic Fallout

Beyond the immediate humanitarian tragedy, such actions destabilise the fragile architecture of international relations. India and the United States share a critical strategic partnership, particularly through frameworks such as the Quad. Unprovoked or reckless military actions that harm Indian citizens strain these diplomatic ties and stoke public outrage in India. Attacks on merchant ships terrify the global seafaring community. When sailors realise that even state superpowers will not guarantee their safety, maritime recruitment declines, insurance premiums soar, and global supply chains face severe disruption.

Furthermore, aggressive naval enforcement in critical waterways such as the Gulf of Oman can destabilise regional security. Relying on military measures to enforce blockades risks triggering retaliatory actions and militarising corridors vital to global commerce. Instead of resolving conflicts, such posturing can undermine diplomatic pathways and escalate tensions, making the high seas more dangerous for all nations.

Conclusion

It is essential for the international community to demand transparency, uphold the protections afforded to civilians under international law, and ensure that commercial shipping lanes remain zones of peace and trade rather than conflict. Upholding these standards is vital for the safety of the global maritime community and the stability of international relations.

The target of a lethal military strike must never be innocent merchant mariners. In the context of international maritime law and global ethics, any deployment of lethal force by the United States or its allies that results in casualties among neutral civilian seafarers, such as Indian sailors, is profoundly condemnable. While geopolitical tensions often flare up in vital shipping lanes, the failure to distinguish between active combatants and civilian commercial crews constitutes a catastrophic failure of intelligence, operational discipline, and adherence to international law.

Naval operations must prioritise the absolute protection of civilian life. Any US strike that inflicts harm on neutral Indian sailors represents a severe breach of international norms that demands transparent accountability, formal apologies, and immediate systemic changes to rules of engagement. The international community cannot allow the fog of war to become a blank cheque for the reckless endangerment of civilian mariners.

(The writer is a retired Indian diplomat and had previously served as ambassador in Kuwait and Morocco and as Consul General in New York. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views.)