Advertisement
Sections
India lacks effective mechanism to tackle foreign bribery, probed zero such cases from 2016 to 2019: Report
The report said that despite India being under the UN Convention Against Corruption since 2011, it has yet to meet Article 16 obligations to define and criminalise foreign bribery.

Credit: transparency.orgThe report highlighted the fact that despite India being under the UN Convention Against Corruption since 2011, it has yet to meet Article 16 obligations to define and criminalise foreign bribery.Hence the legal framework in the country has suffered from other shortcomings which affect India's capacity to prevent and prosecute foreign bribery.
The report finds that despite India accounting for 2.1 percent of global exports, the country has not conducted a single investigation into cases of foreign bribery in the past three years."Despite the several scandals that India has experienced, bribery continues to be used by companies from major exporting countries to win business in the markets," the study noted.The report stated that while the Companies Act 2013 places a greater focus on transparency, accountability and corporate governance than the previous 1956 Act, it is not clear if bribing a foreign public official would be considered an illegal purpose under the law.It also points out inadequacies in the legal framework as one of the reasons for not much action against corruption in India.“Even after several anti-corruption developments i.e. appointment of the first Lokpal (Ombudsman), Amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act, The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017, The Whistle-blowers Protection Act 2014 and many more, India has failed to implement active enforcement. India still has a long way to go in meeting their obligations," the report stated.The report also added that while the listed companies which accept deposits in excess of Rs 50 crore are required to establish a vigilance mechanism to report about unethical behaviour or corruption, in reality, these provisions are minimal and ineffective."There are multiple agencies in India involved in the investigation of cases related to corruption and fraud, and coordination among agencies is seen as the biggest challenge in the timely prosecution of offenders. High-profile investigations are delayed due to political interference. The Indian investigating agencies are short-staffed and many lack the skills to investigate white-collar crime and other economic offences," the report stated.As foreign bribery is not yet criminalised in India, the adequacy of the enforcement system in relation to this specific offence cannot be assessed, the watchdog said. However, certain shortcomings in the enforcement system evident from the current enforcement of domestic corruption would also be a concern for foreign bribery enforcement, it added.The report also highlighted that the Indian government does not publish any statistics on foreign bribery enforcement, nor does it provide such statistics on request.Cases of alleged foreign bribery in IndiaIn 2019, India ranked second after Brazil in terms of the number of investigations concerning alleged bribery of domestic officials by foreign firms, as per the 10th Annual Global Enforcement Report of TRACE International.As per a 2018 report by Transparency International, India, among 16 countries targeted by alleged bribery, has seen several cases of alleged bribery or attempts to bribe Indian government officials by foreign firms including France-based Airbus.The four-year case involved the investigation of accusations that Airbus, between 2004 and 2016, used intermediaries to bribe public officials in numerous countries to buy its planes and satellites.“In 2017, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the 2013 conviction of a Canadian man for conspiring to bribe Indian public officials, including a minister, in a failed bid to win a major contract for Cryptometrics Canada ( a firm) to supply security-screening equipment to Air India,” the report said, giving details of Canada which according to it has “limited enforcement”.The 2018 edition of the report also cited cases of alleged bribery by foreign firms including in a deal of 12 helicopters by Italy-based firm AgustaWestland, where it had again asked India to criminalise foreign bribery and introduce effective legislation to protect whistleblowers in the private sector.“Too many governments choose to turn a blind eye when their companies use bribery to win business in foreign markets,” Transparency International head Delia Ferreira Rubio told The Associated Press. “G-20 countries and other major economies have a responsibility to enforce the rules.”“Our research shows that many countries are barely investigating foreign bribery,” Gillian Dell, the lead author of the Transparency report told AP. “Unfortunately, it’s all too common for businesses in wealthy countries to export corruption to poorer countries, undermining institutions and development.”Recommendations by reportAmongst the recommendations made is that the India should become a party to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, pass legislation criminalising foreign bribery, extend the coverage of whistleblower protections to the private sector and enforce against foreign bribery to the extent possible under existing legislation.The G20 has repeatedly encouraged its member countries, including India, to ratify the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, which establishes legally binding standards to criminalise bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and provides for a host of related measures that make this effective.The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention was adopted in 1997 to address the supply side of international corruption. There are now 44 parties to the convention, 36 of them members of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).“It is a matter of concern that India failed to initiate or conclude a single case of foreign bribery from 2016 to 2019. It needs to reject every form of corruption and ameliorate on several parameters which this report has reflected,” Brij Bhushan Singh, an anti-corruption activist told The Week.The watchdog also recommended ending secrecy in ownership of companies, which makes investigating foreign bribery difficult, and exploring increased liability of parent companies for the actions of their foreign subsidiaries.With inputs from agencies
Tags
First Published:Oct 13, 2020, 20:38:13 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement

J&K cop on Amarnath Yatra duty shot dead in Anantnag terror attack; TRF claims responsibility
The Resistance Front (TRF), a shadow outfit of Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the attack through a social media post
2 min read
Jaishankar meets Canada's Anita Anand, discusses bilateral cooperation and shared interests
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday held talks on bilateral ties with his Canadian counterpart Anita Anand, focusing on cooperation and common goals.
1 min read
Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad... Neet paper leak protest spreads nationwide even as govt reaches out to CJP, Opposition
Protests over the alleged NEET paper leak intensified across multiple cities, while the Centre signalled talks with the Opposition and the Cockroach Janta Party. The Delhi High Court also stepped in, seeking preservation of CCTV footage related to police action.
3 min read
Why is India seeing 95% cloud cover despite a Super El Niño?
India is witnessing nearly 95 per cent cloud cover despite a Super El Niño, a climate event usually linked to weaker monsoons. Regional weather systems, cyclonic circulations, the monsoon trough and moisture from two seas are temporarily overpowering one of the world's strongest climate phenomena
5 min read
Jaishankar, Rubio review trade, defence, AI cooperation at Manila meeting
Jaishankar and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reviewed key pillars of the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership, including trade, defence, energy, critical minerals and artificial intelligence, while also exchanging views on regional and global developments.
1 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
