Study finds that ventilators could be safely shared by two COVID-19 patients for up to two days
During acute shortages, ventilator sharing is a reasonable stopgap to support patients for short periods in centres with appropriate expertise.


Ventilator sharing does not obviate the need for more ventilators but could buy some time while relocating ventilators to hospitals or transferring patients to hospitals with the life-saving machines. Image credit: Wikipedia[/caption]However, a new study involving six critically ill COVID-19 patients at the Manhattan hospital, who were paired up based on similarities in breathing needs, found ventilator sharing was a viable option for up to two days.During acute shortages, ventilator sharing is a reasonable stopgap to support patients for short periods in centres with appropriate expertise, the researchers wrote in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine on Tuesday.“Ventilator sharing does not obviate the need for more ventilators,” Dr Jeremy Beitler of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital and his team wrote. At most, it could buy some time while relocating ventilators to hospitals or transferring patients to hospitals with the life-saving machines.“The safety and utility of prolonged ventilator sharing, when ventilators or patients cannot be relocated, is unknown,” the researchers said.They recommend restricting ventilator sharing to expert centres that could properly identify suitable patients and manage their care.

Stroke in young adults, silent symptoms and late diagnosis: India's growing brain health challenge
Brain tumours aren't always fatal, but delayed diagnosis can be: Experts explain the key warning signs
Spices, health and the Indian plate: Why chilli can be good for you—but moderation is still key
Organ donation: 5 myths you need to stop believing, according to a transplant specialist
Fish over meat: Why a pescatarian diet may help people with obesity live longer
