First life forms on Earth were likely born in ponds and not oceans, study suggests
Oceans didn't retain nitrogenous oxides the way ponds did — a key requirement for life on Earth.


Representational image.[/caption]The current hypothesis for life's origins claims that free-floating molecules of RNA (ribonucleic acids) — the intermediate molecule between DNA and protein that stores information in all living things — was the first molecule to be chemically-induced after the right ingredients (carbon-hydrogen and oxide compounds) came in contact with nitrogenous oxides. These nitrogenous oxides are thought to have entered water bodies by lightning from in the atmosphere, and eventually found its way into oceans.MIT scientists also discovered that a large portion of nitrogenous oxides can be destroyed in oceans by a combination of ultraviolet light from the Sun and iron leaking into oceans from primitive rocks (which reacts with the oxygen). These reactions, put together, probably suppressed levels of nitrogenous oxides in oceans by a factor of 1,000, the study's lead author Sukrit Ranjan from MIT, said in a statement.The study claims that the shallower the pond, the more the chances nitrogenous oxides would have had interacted with other molecules and set in motion chemical reactions that birthed Earth's first resident.

Careless Whispers: Scientists discover that plants can 'talk' to each other using smells
Life on Mars? European Space Agency’s Orbiter discovers ice water deposits at equator
Microsoft briefly overtakes Apple as the most valuable company, Apple back on top again
Even NASA is facing a tough time, starts layoffs following major budget cuts
ISRO, NASA's NISAR satellite to get ready by Jan-end, will monitor Earth's snow-covered regions
