Judge says Apple conspired to raise prices on e-books
In a decision that could reshape how books are sold on the Internet, a federal judge ruled that Apple conspired to raise the retail prices of e-books in violation of antitrust law...

In a decision that could reshape how books are sold on the Internet, a federal judge ruled that Apple conspired to raise the retail prices of e-books in violation of antitrust law, and called for a trial on damages. The decision by US District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan is a victory for the US government and various states, which the judge said are entitled to injunctive relief.

Apple goes to court for conspiring to raise prices on e-books (Image credit: Reuters)
Only Apple went to trial, while the publishers - Lagardere's Hachette Book Group and Macmillan, News Corp's HarperCollins Publishers, Pearson's Penguin and CBS Corp's Simon & Schuster- settled with the US government and the states. Cote said the conspiracy resulted in prices for some e-books rising to $12.99 (Rs 780 approx) or $14.99 (Rs 900 approx), when Amazon had sold for $9.99 (Rs 600 approx).
"The plaintiffs have shown that the publisher defendants conspired with each other to eliminate retail price competition in order to raise e-book prices, and that Apple played a central role in facilitating and executing that conspiracy," Cote said. "Without Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did in the spring of 2010," she added. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Cote issued her 159-page decision after a non-jury trial that ended on June 20.
Reuters

Why AI notetakers are raising serious privacy and security concerns
China's low-cost AI models are changing the global AI race. Here's why Silicon Valley is worried
China's Kimi K3 challenges US AI leaders with frontier-level performance at lower cost
How did Instagram run ads promoting child abuse in India?
Why has India halted WhatsApp’s username feature before launch?
