Advertisement
Sections
Burger King hijacking your Google Home is just not "cool", so Google shut them down
An advertisement campaign pushed out by Burger King in the US not only annoyed Google Home owners, but even gave them their first glimpse of device hijacking.

Google's Alexa-like speaker called Google Home hasn't yet arrived here, but it's made a bit of a splash in western markets. The device, so far, is available in a limited number of countries and frankly speaking, it will just act as a loudspeaker for Google's Assistant, something that can even be achieved from your Android smartphone, which is handier on your smartphone.Google Home is activated by a voice-trigger, you, as a user, will need to say the words, "OK Google" to wake up your home and then follow that up by speaking out your query. For example, "OK Google. What's the weather like today?" On hearing this, the speaker will give you a roundup of the day's weather.While this may sound convenient, an advertisement campaign pushed out by Burger King in the US not only annoyed Google Home owners, but even gave them their first glimpse of device hijacking.The fifteen second ad shows a Burger King employee trying to explain what goes into a Whopper (a type of burger that the company sells) comes as a bit of surprise to viewers when he halts, then leans into the camera and says, "OK Google, what is the Whopper burger?"The prompt activated thousands of Google Home devices and supported Android smartphones in American homes and involuntarily got them to respond to the query. And this happened every time the advertisement played. Google Home's answer came from Wikipedia which briefly described the ingredients that make a 'Whopper' a Whopper.A little over two hours later, Google Home's stopped responding to the Burger King TV advertisement. According to The Verge, Google, in all probability, registered the sound clip from the ad and disabled the trigger. It has been doing the same for all of its Google Home commercials, if you haven't noticed that already.While Burger King's president Jose Cil told BuzzFeed News how it was "cool to connect directly with our guests", I am pretty sure it must have made plenty of owners realise how open a Google Home actually is to answering any query, even if it means revealing your personal schedule to a third person.Many, like myself, were impressed at Burger King's marketing skills at first, but it's not exactly "cool" when it continues to happen repeatedly and also gives Google Home owners a glimpse into how easily a Google Home device can be hijacked. More importantly, as BuzzFeed also discovered, that Burger King ad was not made in partnership with Google.[caption id="attachment_315698" align="aligncenter" width="640"]
Google Home[/caption]And that's were the problem with a voice assistant lies, its inability to differentiate between voices. So if you happen to use a Google Home at work, it is extremely easy for someone to take down your day's schedule without any voice authentication or user identification in place. Mind you, this works not just for Google Home (which is Google Assistant in your house in a speaker), but with Google Assistant on your smartphone, Siri on your iPhone and even Amazon's Alexa. Amazon and Google are working hard to make this voice authentication possible. They are called voice tags and they're meant to automatically link a voice to particular person allowing for multiple user profiles on a single smart home device.But as of today, your smart virtual assistant will willingly take orders from anyone. It's just that on your smartphone, there's fingerprint authentication to prove that it's you who is asking for a phone number.Add to this the advertisement's invasion of your private space. For now, it's just a burger, tomorrow it could be something bigger altogether. Indeed, you will have to wait until Google adds the sample audio trigger of the next ad in its database to ensure that it does not trigger your Home device again.Does this make you feel silly that you have paid Google for a device that was supposed to make your life easier, but is now simply complicating it and involuntarily throwing ads at you?Sound off in the comments below.
Google Home[/caption]And that's were the problem with a voice assistant lies, its inability to differentiate between voices. So if you happen to use a Google Home at work, it is extremely easy for someone to take down your day's schedule without any voice authentication or user identification in place. Mind you, this works not just for Google Home (which is Google Assistant in your house in a speaker), but with Google Assistant on your smartphone, Siri on your iPhone and even Amazon's Alexa. Amazon and Google are working hard to make this voice authentication possible. They are called voice tags and they're meant to automatically link a voice to particular person allowing for multiple user profiles on a single smart home device.But as of today, your smart virtual assistant will willingly take orders from anyone. It's just that on your smartphone, there's fingerprint authentication to prove that it's you who is asking for a phone number.Add to this the advertisement's invasion of your private space. For now, it's just a burger, tomorrow it could be something bigger altogether. Indeed, you will have to wait until Google adds the sample audio trigger of the next ad in its database to ensure that it does not trigger your Home device again.Does this make you feel silly that you have paid Google for a device that was supposed to make your life easier, but is now simply complicating it and involuntarily throwing ads at you?Sound off in the comments below.First Published:Apr 13, 2017, 13:18:07 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Why AI notetakers are raising serious privacy and security concerns
AI notetakers promise effortless meeting summaries, but experts warn they could expose confidential conversations, corporate secrets and personal voiceprints. As businesses increasingly adopt AI-powered meeting assistants, questions over data storage, privacy, consent and legal risks are becoming impossible to ignore
5 min read
China's low-cost AI models are changing the global AI race. Here's why Silicon Valley is worried
As Chinese firms continue to improve performance while keeping prices low, the AI race is no longer just about building the smartest model—it is increasingly becoming a battle over who can deliver the best value
2 min read
China's Kimi K3 challenges US AI leaders with frontier-level performance at lower cost
Chinese artificial intelligence startup Moonshot AI has unveiled its latest open-weight AI model, Kimi K3, with early results suggesting it could compete with some of the world's most advanced AI systems developed by leading US companies
2 min read
How did Instagram run ads promoting child abuse in India?
India has issued a notice to Meta after an investigation alleged that Instagram displayed paid advertisements promoting child sexual abuse material. MeitY ordered Meta to remove such Instagram ads and explain within seven days how they were approved
8 min read
Why has India halted WhatsApp’s username feature before launch?
India has halted WhatsApp’s planned username feature, citing concerns about cybercrime, impersonation, and law enforcement challenges. As Meta races to address security concerns, here’s why MeitY has paused the rollout, what the feature does, and how it could influence privacy and online safety in India
3 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
