'I am now confident India will catch up in AI models': Sridhar Vembu credits China's AI rise for spurring global competition

Sridhar Vembu is known for being vocal about developments in the technology industry. In a recent post, he criticized Microsoft's history of monopolistic practices and argued that growing competition from Chinese AI companies is crucial not only for India but for the broader global AI ecosystem.

In the post, Vembu shared an anecdote about how an Indian customer managed to secure a steep discount on a Microsoft Office licence renewal. According to him, the customer told Microsoft they were considering switching to Zoho's Office suite, prompting the software giant to reduce the renewal price by 90%. Vembu also cited the long-running antitrust case against Microsoft to support his criticism of the company's business practices.

He went on to argue that the declining cost of training AI models has made him optimistic about India's prospects in artificial intelligence. Vembu said multiple AI initiatives are underway across academia and industry and pointed to the progress being made by the BharatGen project at IIT Bombay as evidence that India is steadily closing the gap in AI model development. As AI training costs continue to fall, he said there is "no reason to be despondent" about India's ability to build competitive AI models.

More from Tech

The case against Microsoft

Microsoft was found to have illegally maintained a monopoly in the landmark United States v. Microsoft Corp. antitrust case. Filed in 1998 by the US Department of Justice and 20 state attorneys general, the lawsuit alleged that Microsoft used its dominant position in the PC operating system market to stifle competition by bundling its Internet Explorer browser with Windows, making it difficult for rivals such as Netscape Navigator to compete.

In April 2000, US District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled that Microsoft had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in anti-competitive practices. He later ordered the company to be split into two separate businesses—one focused on the Windows operating system and the other on software products, including Internet Explorer and Microsoft Office. However, the breakup order was later overturned on appeal, though the finding that Microsoft had maintained an illegal monopoly was upheld.