Advertisement

Can't justify rape by calling a woman promiscuous: Supreme Court

Promiscuous character of a woman is irrelevant in rape cases and a rapist cannot take it as ground of defence for his heinous act, the Supreme Court has ruled saying even a female of easy virtue has a right to life.

Advertisement
FP Archives|May 17, 2013, 18:26:09 IST

 New Delhi: Promiscuous character of a woman is irrelevant in rape cases and a rapist cannot take it as ground of defence for his heinous act, the Supreme Court has ruled saying even a female of easy virtue has a right to life.Holding that rape is not only an offence against a woman, but a crime against the entire society, the apex court said that courts should deal with such cases sternly and severely. "Even if the victim had lost her virginity earlier, it can certainly not give a licence to any person to rape her."[caption id="attachment_792805" align="alignleft" width="300"]Protests in Delhi against rape. Agencies. Protests in Delhi against rape. Agencies.[/caption]It is the accused who was on trial and not the victim. So as to whether the victim is of a promiscuous character is totally an irrelevant issue altogether in a case of rape," a bench of justices B S Chauhan and F M I Kalifulla said. The bench passed the order on an appeal filed by a rape convict challenging his conviction on the ground that the victim was of promiscuous character and had been habitual to sexual activities. It, however, refused to grant relief to the accused saying that it is not material that the rape victim was accustomed to sexual intercourse."Even a woman of easy virtue has a right to refuse to submit herself to sexual intercourse to anyone and everyone, because she is not a vulnerable object or prey for being sexually assaulted by anyone and everyone," the bench said."The courts should deal with such cases sternly and severely. Sexual violence, apart from being a dehumanizing act, is an unlawful intrusion on the right of privacy and sanctity of a woman. It is a serious blow to her supreme honour and offends her self-esteem and dignity as well," the bench said."It degrades and humiliates the victim and where the victim is a helpless innocent child or a minor, it leaves behind a traumatic experience. A rapist not only causes physical injuries, but leaves behind a scar on the most cherished position of a woman, i.e. her dignity, honour, reputation and chastity," it said.PTI

Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.
First Published:May 17, 2013, 18:26:07 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending Stories

Delhi Police asks personnel to wear uniform: What the law says on cops in plainclothes during protests

The Delhi Police has instructed all its personnel to wear uniforms when they report for duty at Jantar Mantar for crowd control. This comes after outrage grew over videos of men in civilian clothes or without name tags hitting protesters in the Capital. Is it legal for the police to ditch uniforms during protests?
4 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next