Competition Commission probes Hyderabad airport operator GHIAL for unfair business ways
Competition Commission of India has ordered a detailed probe against Hyderabad international airport operator GHIAL for alleged abuse of dominant position and denial of market access to a leading MRO services provider


File image of Hyderabad airport. Wikimedia Commons.[/caption]The complaint was filed against GHIAL and GMR Aero Technic Ltd (GAT), a wholly-owned subsidiary of GMR Aerospace Engineering Ltd. The latter is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GMR. It was alleged that GMR owing to its sole control over the Hyderabad airport premises has denied access to Air Works for providing the Line Maintenance Services with an intent to give advantage to GAT at the aerodrome. Line Maintenance Services can include activities like troubleshooting, defect rectification, component replacement, schedule maintenance and/or checks, minor repairs and modifications and visual inspections. Such service is required to be provided during the time between the landing and take-off of any aircraft to declare it airworthy and make it fit for departure. To assess the complaint, Competition Commission of India (CCI) considered the markets for 'provision of access to airport facilities/ premises' and 'provision of Line Maintenance Services' at the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (RGIA). Hyderabad aerodrome is known as RGIA. The watchdog noted that the alleged conduct by GHIAL has the potential to limit and restrict the provision of Line Maintenance Services and the technical development relating to the provisioning of such services to the prejudice of consumers within certain provisions of the Competition Act. "The Commission is of the considered view that prima facie a contravention with regard to Section 4(2)(b), Section 4(2)(c) and Section 4(2)(e) of the Act is made out against GMR," the order, dated October 3, said. Section 4(2)(c) pertains to limiting and restricting the provision of services that adversely impacts competition in the relevant market. Section 4(2)(c) relates to the denial of market access while Section 4(2)(e) is about leveraging of dominant position in the upstream market to protect the downstream market. According to the order, since GMR is the major shareholder of GHIAL, it has been used synonymously with the latter for the purposes of analysing the case.

Google burns cash for first time as AI spending pushes 2026 capex to $205 billion
Tesla sells more cars but makes less money: Why Musk’s AI pivot is squeezing profits
No premium queues, 30-minute target: What changes for Indian passport applicants in UAE
Bharat Forge, Flying Whales sign pact to develop 60-tonne airships for India’s defence logistics
Air India to cut Delhi-Toronto flight time by 3 hours, resume non-stop services from August 1

