US: How NSA surveillance exposed political party divisions
The debate about whether to continue the dragnet surveillance of Americans' phone records is highlighting divisions within the Democratic and Republican parties that could transform the politics of national security.

Washington: The debate about whether to continue the dragnet surveillance of Americans' phone records is highlighting divisions within the Democratic and Republican parties that could transform the politics of national security.[caption id="attachment_1396047" align="alignleft" width="380"]
Representational image. AFP.[/caption]While some leading Democrats are reluctant to condemn the National Security Agency's tactics, a growing number of Republicans are embracing a libertarian shift opposing the spy agency's broad surveillance powers. That's a striking departure from the aggressive national security policies that have defined the Republican Party for generations.The lines are drawn but not in the traditional way. The Republican National Committee, libertarians and liberals are on one side of the debate. And Republicans and Democrats, such as the House and Senate leadership, are on the other side, supporting the Obama administration's surveillance programs.AP

Nawaz Sharif wants to become prime minister of PoK — but laws framed by Pakistan disqualify him
Fake jobs, tourist visas: Inside Russia’s vast network luring foreigners to fight Ukraine war
As Pakistan eyes American dollar for Iran mediation, economists sound the alarm: ‘It can buy time, not growth’
Are Chinese UN peacekeepers spies? Trump’s UN envoy sends out a warning
Why has Bangladesh’s choice of India spokespersons raised eyebrows?
