Benefits of 'drastic' measures to address emissions, warming outweigh costs: economists
The costs of failing to slash carbon pollution would rapidly balloon to reach trillions of dollars every year, as per a new study.


Currently, there's no way to tell or track where climate refugees will go, which is an added pressure on a steadily–worsening situation. Image: Getty[/caption]For years economists have been divided on the cost-benefit equation involved in funding climate action, with even Nobel Prize-winning academics such as William Nordhaus arguing that strong actions should be balanced against costs.Most traditional models of climate cost focus on changes to GDP in a specific year — that is, a so-called “level impact.”But more and more research has shown that climate change will reduce economic growth below what has been projected globally.The consensus reached by survey respondents suggested that the projected economic fallout from climate change would reach US$1.7 trillion annually by 2025 and roughly US$30 trillion per year by 2075.By contrast, 65 percent of respondents said that the costs of renewable energy technology such as wind and solar would continue to fall over the next decade and estimated that half of the world’s energy mix would be green by 2050.Nearly 80 percent of respondents said their level of concern over climate had increased during the last five years.

Pakistan resorts to its military-terror nexus in a bid to neutralise Munir critic, JUI-F chief Rehman: Report
No premium queues, 30-minute target: What changes for Indian passport applicants in UAE
'We don't need straits': Trump says Iran war isn't about Hormuz as US strikes for 12th night
Iran claims to stop three oil tankers transiting Strait of Hormuz
Globe at a glance: From Houthis striking Saudi tankers in Red Sea to wildfires in Europe
