Advertisement

After New York Times and Bloomberg, now Reuters websites become inaccessible in China

Reuters news websites were inaccessible in China on Friday, after users first experienced difficulties accessing them late on Thursday.

Advertisement
FP Archives|Mar 20, 2015, 10:53:37 IST

Beijing: The news websites of Reuters, including those in English and Chinese, were inaccessible in China on Friday, after users first experienced difficulties accessing them late on Thursday.[caption id="attachment_2164219" align="alignleft" width="380" class=" "]Representational image. Reuters Representational image. Reuters[/caption]The websites of Bloomberg News, the New York Times and News Corp's Wall Street Journal have all been inaccessible in China for some time.It was not immediately clear why users were hindered from using the Reuters sites.The websites of some major news organisations, including Reuters, have at times become inaccessible in China in whole or part, often after the publication of stories on issues about which the Chinese government is sensitive.The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), the country's Internet regulator, did not immediately respond to a written request for comment."Reuters is committed to practicing fair and accurate journalism worldwide. We recognise the great importance of news about China to all our customers, and we hope that our sites will be restored in China soon," a Reuters spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.Reuters is the news division of Thomson Reuters Corp. Thomson Reuters also sells financial news and data services to clients in China. These services remained available.Reuters

Handpicked stories, in your inbox
Global stories. Indian perspective. Zero noise.
No Spam. Unsubscribe Any Time.
First Published:Mar 20, 2015, 10:52:11 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending Stories

Austria turns Hitler’s birthplace into a police station 81 years after his death: 5 things to know

Austrian authorities inaugurated a police station at the birthplace of Adolf Hitler after years of debate around the site’s troubled legacy.
3 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up Next