AF 447 to MH370: Why finding planes that crash in seas is tough
A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 with 239 people on board disappeared over open ocean en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, and has proved remarkably difficult to find.


A woman taking a photo of a screen displaying the number of hours since a Malaysia Airlines passenger jet had gone missing at a mall in Beijing, China. AP[/caption]"I think at the time a lot of people were looking at Air France 447 as unique," William Waldock, who teaches accident investigation at the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University "We really had not had one like that where it takes so long to find it."But a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 with 239 people on board disappeared over open ocean en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, and has proved remarkably difficult to find.Data recorders typically record over a 24-hour period at least hundreds of types of information about how a plane is functioning. Investigators count on that information for clues to the cause of an accident, including how the engines are working, the pilots' actions, the status of key systems like the autopilot and autothrottle, and the position of wing flaps and rudder.The cockpit voice recorders contain pilots' conversations and any sounds inside the cockpit in a continuous two-hour loop.Both are required to be equipped with an underwater locator beacon powered by a tiny radioactive pellet that continually sends out sonic signals for a minimum of 30 days. In recent years there has been discussion about whether the beacon signals should be required to last at least 90 days, according to the NTSB.Even with a functioning beacon, the signal can only be heard underwater with special equipment and can diminish depending upon the ocean depth, water currents and whether the boxes are buried in silt or sand.There have been discussions about requiring boxes be made so that they float, and of attaching underwater locator devices to the plane's structure to help find both the wreckage and the boxes, the board said.Another idea that has been discussed is whether airliners should have emergency locator transmitters — which are different than underwater beacons — that automatically detach and float to the surface if the plane plunges into water. Such transmitters, which employ satellite technology, only work above the water. The US Navy has had such floating transmitters on its planes for about 15 years, Waldock said."It boils down to expense as much as anything," Waldock said. "These systems are pricey."A technical advisory committee to the Federal Aviation Administration began a three-day meeting in Washington on Monday about whether transmitter standards should be strengthened.Some newer airliners already stream much of the same information recorded by black boxes back to their home base via satellite. Airlines do this primarily so that they know whether there are any problems with the plane that require maintenance or repairs. If they get the information while the plane is still in-flight, they can have mechanics and parts in place when it lands, saving time and money.But if planes also streamed back information like altitude, airspeed and heading, it could also provide critical clues to searchers in the event of a crash. However, if all the thousands of airliners that are in the air in the US everyday were all streaming large amounts of data at the same time, there wouldn't be enough bandwith to transmit the data or enough capability to record it on the ground, Waldock said.Associated Press

Indian trucker arrested in US over alleged theft of $3 million worth of tungsten powder
Austria turns Hitler’s birthplace into a police station 81 years after his death: 5 things to know
Nawaz Sharif wants to become prime minister of PoK — but laws framed by Pakistan disqualify him
Fake jobs, tourist visas: Inside Russia’s vast network luring foreigners to fight Ukraine war
As Pakistan eyes American dollar for Iran mediation, economists sound the alarm: ‘It can buy time, not growth’
