Advertisement
Sections
Former Google executive reveals why he left, says proposal for Human Rights Program was repeatedly rejected
Ross LaJeunesse says that he was 'sidelined' from the conversations regarding 'Project Dragonfly'.

Ross LaJeunesse, former Google head of International Relations, stepped down from his position in April 2019 but never revealed the reason for doing so. However, now, LaJeunesse has come clean about why he left the company.In a blogpost on Medium, LaJeunesse says that he was "sidelined" from the conversations regarding the company's "Project Dragonfly". To recall, under Google's secret project, the company was trying to launch a censored search engine in China. In collaboration with a Beijing-based website called 265.com, Google had reportedly developed blacklists for blocking out certain categories, keywords from a probable Chinese search engine such as democracy, human rights, and peaceful protest.(Also read: Google’s internal conflict with privacy team has led to the end of Project Dragonfly)[caption id="attachment_7855091" align="alignnone" width="1024"]![Ross LaJeunesse. Image: Getty]()

Ross LaJeunesse. Image: Getty[/caption]LaJeunesse writes in the blog post, "I was alarmed when I learned in 2017 that the company had begun moving forward with the development of a new version of a censored Search product for China, codenamed 'Dragonfly'". The company had stepped back from China market earlier because the government demanded full access to the company's user data and wanted the company to fully co-operate to ensure that the Chinese users saw only that content that was "in line with the government".
He further said that when Google announced that it will set up a Google Center for Artificial Intelligence in Beijing, that is when he felt powerless. He writes, "it made it clear to me that I no longer had the ability to influence the numerous product developments and deals being pursued by the company."(Also read: Google employees 'confused and angry' about censored search engine for China)After this, he thought that if Google adopts country-wide Human Rights Program publicly, it would make them follow the human rights principles. But it did not pan out as he thought it would. He says, "Each time I recommended a Human Rights Program, senior executives came up with an excuse to say no." He says that because he was constantly "advocating for a human rights-based approach", he was "sidelined" from the ongoing conversations on whether the company should go ahead with "Project Dragonfly" or not.According to him, "Just when Google needed to double down on a commitment to human rights, it decided to instead chase bigger profits and an even higher stock price."He also saw an unhealthy work culture where "senior colleagues bullied and screamed at young women, causing them to cry at their desks". When he went to HR about this he was assured that it will be taken care of.After that, he "accidentally got copied in an email from a senior HR director. In the email, the HR director told a colleague that I seemed to raise concerns like these a lot, and instructed her to 'do some digging' on me instead."(Also read: Sundar Pichai to head Google's parent co, Alphabet Inc: The rise of a soft-spoken engineer from Chennai)He was assured after this episode that he has been misunderstanding the situation and "was offered a small role in exchange for my acquiescence and silence."LaJeunesse says that he was “re-orged out of a job” and left the company.Fast-forward to present, he is running for the Senate as a Democrat in Maine.First Published:Jan 03, 2020, 13:02:45 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Why AI notetakers are raising serious privacy and security concerns
AI notetakers promise effortless meeting summaries, but experts warn they could expose confidential conversations, corporate secrets and personal voiceprints. As businesses increasingly adopt AI-powered meeting assistants, questions over data storage, privacy, consent and legal risks are becoming impossible to ignore
5 min read
China's low-cost AI models are changing the global AI race. Here's why Silicon Valley is worried
As Chinese firms continue to improve performance while keeping prices low, the AI race is no longer just about building the smartest model—it is increasingly becoming a battle over who can deliver the best value
2 min read
China's Kimi K3 challenges US AI leaders with frontier-level performance at lower cost
Chinese artificial intelligence startup Moonshot AI has unveiled its latest open-weight AI model, Kimi K3, with early results suggesting it could compete with some of the world's most advanced AI systems developed by leading US companies
2 min read
How did Instagram run ads promoting child abuse in India?
India has issued a notice to Meta after an investigation alleged that Instagram displayed paid advertisements promoting child sexual abuse material. MeitY ordered Meta to remove such Instagram ads and explain within seven days how they were approved
8 min read
Why has India halted WhatsApp’s username feature before launch?
India has halted WhatsApp’s planned username feature, citing concerns about cybercrime, impersonation, and law enforcement challenges. As Meta races to address security concerns, here’s why MeitY has paused the rollout, what the feature does, and how it could influence privacy and online safety in India
3 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement
