Facebook's former security chief says election security is still vulnerable
Election security has not improved since 2016, and the midterms will not be trustworthy.


Alex Stamos, former Chief Security Officer for Facebook. Image: Reuters[/caption]In an interview with TechCrunch on 6 September, Stamos said that “If there’s no foreign interference during the midterms, it’s not because we did a great job. It’s because our adversaries decided to [show] a little forbearance, which is unfortunate.”The infrastructure for security campaigns and elections in the US have not improved since 2016, and the midterm elections which is just two months away will see some trouble. “As a society, we have not responded to the 2016 election in the way that would’ve been necessary to have a more trustworthy midterm,” he says. While there have been some good changes in the system, the overall election security still remains vulnerable.He is convinced that, while the foreign interference cannot directly alter election results, they can most certainly mess up the entire electoral process, putting it into further question.Recently, he wrote a post on how the US has already failed to protect the 2018 elections and that the company is not prepared for it. He did, however, mention that the there are a couple of ways to possibly improve the security for the presidential elections in 2020.

Why AI notetakers are raising serious privacy and security concerns
China's low-cost AI models are changing the global AI race. Here's why Silicon Valley is worried
China's Kimi K3 challenges US AI leaders with frontier-level performance at lower cost
How did Instagram run ads promoting child abuse in India?
Why has India halted WhatsApp’s username feature before launch?
