Advertisement
Sections
The Jaitley standard of justice: Which of our MPs qualifies?
In indicting Soumitra Sen, Jaitley argued "litigants cannot be judged by a judge, who himself is stigmatised." If so which of our MPs is qualified to judge Sen? Vote in our exclusive poll now.
[/caption]Sen is charged with misappropriation of funds that were entrusted to him by the courts during litigation. Funds that were eventually to go to the winners of the case, but which were demonstrably used for the payment of his credit card bills, among other things. When ordered by the court, the judge appears to have returned all the money.The judge made his case mainly on points of law (or technicalities, to use a disambiguation), and seemed personally convinced that he was in the clear – but did not appear to have convinced anyone else in the Rajya Sabha.If you listened to both sides of the argument, you would be in no doubt that the Sen was guilty as charged. The BJP’s Arun Jaitley was ruthlessly efficient in identifying the fundamental flaw in Sen’s defence: the non-disclosure of inconvenient truths. Jaitley had opened by saying that the impeachment was an unusual circumstance: that the House was being asked to judge someone who judges others. But he also made a much larger and incontrovertible point:Judiciary performs a divine function where ordinary humans decide the fate of others. When this divine function of deciding the fate of others is bestowed in a judge, we expect him to perform it with the highest standards of scholarship and utmost impartiality... In this case, when the judge under inquiry says that his offence must be proved 'to the hilt' or 'proved beyond reasonable doubt', he relies on technicalities rather than substance. A judge is like Caesar's wife. He must be beyond suspicion. Caesar divorced his wife merely on the basis of suspicion. Those who occupy high offices must live through the scrutiny of highest standards of probity. A judge must be beyond suspicion.Jaitley's argument seems reasonable: that any individual who sits in judgment on someone must be at least equal or better to the person being judged.But he makes this claim in the context of a historic occasion: the impeachment of a Supreme Court judge. A rare event when the members of Parliament are required to play judges themselves. The context that raises an interesting conundrum: If a judge has to be perceived as being above suspicion then it is logical to say that members of Parliament, who sit in judgement on him, adhere at least to the same standards. Surely a quick look at the faces around him ought have given Jaitley pause.(One quick aside: the last time an impeachment motion was moved against a judge – Justice V Ramaswami of the Supreme Court in 1993 – Kapil Sibal, then a senior advaocate of the Supreme Court, defended him in the Lok Sabha. The motion against Ramaswami fell because the Congress abstained.)But let us grant that every politician or MP isn’t corrupt or perceived to be so. Let us forget cash for votes, 2G and the longish list of other scams for a while. Jaitley's standard demands personal probity on the part of the judges, but not of the larger system. If we asked merely that "litigants cannot be judged by a judge, who himself is stigmatised," which of the assembled 'judges' would qualify?Let us just pick a few names out of the hat from among that august group charged, incidentally, with a similar responsibility as the judge: the protection of public wealth. And let us test whether these familiar MPs are ‘perceived as above suspicion’, the qualification necessary to sit in judgment on someone like Soumitra Sen.
First Published:Aug 18, 2011, 16:40:40 IST
Advertisement
Advertisement
Rahul Gandhi, Kharge lead protest near PM residence; Centre says Parliament discussion was offered
The developments come amid the continuing CJP-led agitation at Jantar Mantar, where protesters have vowed to continue their sit-in despite recent clashes with Delhi Police
2 min read
Parliament's Monsoon Session from July 20: Key bills, numbers game to dominate agenda
The Monsoon Session of Parliament will begin on July 20 and continue till August 13, with the government expected to push several key legislations, including constitutional amendment bills
2 min read
Major blow to Uddhav Thackeray as six Lok Sabha MPs join Shinde camp
In a major political setback for Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray, six of the party's nine Lok Sabha MPs joined the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena in Mumbai on Monday
2 min read
12 years and counting: NDA leaders felicitate PM Modi as he trumps Nehru's tenure record
Leaders of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) on Wednesday felicitated Prime Minister Narendra Modi on completing 12 years in office and becoming India's longest-serving continuously elected Prime Minister
3 min read
‘Trust, progress and welfare’: PM Modi celebrates 12 years in office, highlights big policy moves
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday marked 12 years in office. He described the period as one dedicated to "trust, development and public welfare" while highlighting key achievements of his government
3 min read
Advertisement
Advertisement