Delhi's unauthorised colonies: Big poll agenda, but regularisation remains a dream
As as Delhi stares at another assembly election, the issue of regularisation for unauthorised colonies has been revived and replayed for maximum public effect.


File photo of roads being build in an authorised colony in Delhi. Naresh Sharma/Firstpost[/caption]“Over a period of time, unauthorised colonies came up on government land acquired in 1970s and 1980s. But on paper, the land still belongs to the government. Under the new law, most of the land on which the unauthorised colonies have come up can be acquired by the government or people can be asked to pay more money,” he said while addressing the Delhi Village Dialogue at Chhatarpur.“These colonies have not been regularised for a long time due to wrong policies of successive governments. Does it mean that now the government agencies will become the owner of such land according to the provisions of the ordinance? Chhatarpur will suffer the most because of this law,” he claimed.According to former IAS officer and director of NGO Common Cause, KK Jaswal, whose PIL in 1993 opposing the government’s regularisation drive led to the 2008 framework of guidelines for regularisation, the government’s decision will give a message that you can encroach on government land or uncared for private land and no one is going to bother.“Unauthorised colonies came into existence because of the systematic failure of the government. First, the administration failed to provide suitable accommodation for people who keep flocking to the city in search of jobs. Second, there was total abdication of responsibility on the part of the civic agencies in ensuring that encroachments do not happen," says Jaswal."If we have municipal authorities and government functionaries of local bodies who look the other way for reasons which are not difficult to fathom, then unauthorised structures will come up. And then suddenly you wake up because there are pressing humanitarian problems and basic amenities have to be provided. But the decision will give a message that you can encroach on government land or uncared for private land and no one is going to mind,” he said.But some policy experts argue that the lakhs of residents who live in such colonies cannot be punished for the collective failure of successive governments to meet the massive demand for housing in a growing metropolis like Delhi.“The reason why these colonies came up was because there was a lack of affordable housing or lack of government housing. But Delhi as a city kept growing which is one of the big reasons why these colonies came up in the first place. Hence, when the guidelines are being framed by the government, it is an opportunity for the state to say that we have failed in providing public housing and hence we are now putting together a process of regularisation,” says Shahana Sheikh, a research associate at the Centre for Policy Research (CPR). Sheikh has co-authored a report on Delhi’s unauthorised colonies titled The Thin Line between Legitimate and Illegal–Regularising Unauthorised Colonies in Delhi.Delhi has over 1,600 unauthorised colonies, some of them over two decades old, that are thriving, highly dense living spaces. It is more practical, argues Sheikh, for the government to regularise such colonies than to go on demolition drives.While there is consensus across party lines on the need to regularise, the handling of the process by successive governments has raised serious doubts about the political and administrative commitment to clean up the mess."They have dealt with the issue in a very ham-handed manner. They have not thought through the issue, they have not tied up all the loose ends. These are knee-jerk and motivated actions at the time of elections. There is no policy consistency. There is no administrative or political commitment to see that some order is enforced," said Jaswal.Sheikh blames the lack of coordination between the multiple urban local bodies for the lack of movement on the ground."When you have multiple bodies, in this case, three municipal corporations, the state government and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), which is the largest land-owning authority in Delhi - these agencies need to coordinate. There was a specific timeline in which the DDA notification was laid out. But it is clear, given what we have seen in the past that nobody stuck to those timelines. While it is important to pass regulations and guidelines, in order to translate it on the ground, agencies have to get activated," she said.But there is also a more cynical explanation as to why regularisation is always promised but never delivered. In 2008 ahead of the assembly polls, the then Sheila Dikshit-led Congress government handed out provisional regularisation certificates to 1,218 colonies, then again in 2010 the same government issued an order listing 895 colonies as 'eligible for regularisation', But neither regularisation nor development reached a majority of the colonies."It seems that by not completing the process properly as per the guidelines set by the government, it is trying to keep these residents in limbo. Most of these residents are holding voter ID cards. They are all voters," said Sheikh.As the CPR report observes, "Given the significant number of voters that live in these colonies, debate around their status has been Central in at least three consecutive Delhi Government elections, including the most recent in December 2013. Pre-election promises have often included regularisation for UACs (unauthorised colonies)."And sure enough, as Delhi stares at another assembly election, the issue of regularisation has been revived and replayed for maximum public effect.

Rahul Gandhi, Kharge lead protest near PM residence; Centre says Parliament discussion was offered
Parliament's Monsoon Session from July 20: Key bills, numbers game to dominate agenda
Major blow to Uddhav Thackeray as six Lok Sabha MPs join Shinde camp
12 years and counting: NDA leaders felicitate PM Modi as he trumps Nehru's tenure record
‘Trust, progress and welfare’: PM Modi celebrates 12 years in office, highlights big policy moves
